Sound diminishes from x to y over what distance?

  • Thread starter gmmstr827
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sound
In summary: The ratio was about 100 times farther away, so sqrt(100) = 10, so you were 10 times farther away than 100 times farther away. So 10*100 = 1000 times farther away, and 1000 * 2.2m = 2200m. In other words, 2.2km.In summary, when a dB meter registers 130 dB at a distance of 2.2 m from a loudspeaker on a stage, the power output of the speaker can be calculated using the formula I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0 as 10 W/m^2. To determine the distance where the sound level would be 85 dB,
  • #1
gmmstr827
86
1

Homework Statement



At a rock concert, a dB meter registered 130 dB when placed 2.2 m in front of a loudspeaker on the stage. (a) What was the power output of the speaker, assuming uniform spherical spreading of the sound and neglecting absorption in the air? (b) How far away would the sound level be a somewhat reasonable 85 dB?

Homework Equations



I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0 where I_0 = 1*10^-12 W/m^2
I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0
I = 10^(130 dB/10)*10^-12
I_2 = 10 W/m^2

b)
Convert dB to W/m^2:
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0
I = 10^(85 dB/10)*10^-12
I_1 = 3.16 * 10^-4 W/m^2

Solve for r in formula: I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2) >>> r = √(I_2/(4πI_1))
r = √(10 W/m^2/(4π(3.16 * 10^-4 W/m^2))
r = 501824 m

Part b) is obviously way too large to be right. I need a formula that incorporates the original distance. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
gmmstr827 said:

Homework Statement



At a rock concert, a dB meter registered 130 dB when placed 2.2 m in front of a loudspeaker on the stage. (a) What was the power output of the speaker, assuming uniform spherical spreading of the sound and neglecting absorption in the air? (b) How far away would the sound level be a somewhat reasonable 85 dB?

Homework Equations



I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0 where I_0 = 1*10^-12 W/m^2
I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0
I = 10^(130 dB/10)*10^-12
I_2 = 10 W/m^2

b)
Convert dB to W/m^2:
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0
I = 10^(85 dB/10)*10^-12
I_1 = 3.16 * 10^-4 W/m^2

Solve for r in formula: I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2) >>> r = √(I_2/(4πI_1))
r = √(10 W/m^2/(4π(3.16 * 10^-4 W/m^2))
r = 501824 m

Part b) is obviously way too large to be right. I need a formula that incorporates the original distance. Any ideas?

An easier way to approach part (b) is to look at the difference in dB, and convert that into the ratio of the intensities. Since the intensity varys by 1/r^2, having the ratio of the intensities will give you the ratio of the r^2, and that let's you find the 2nd r value.

Give that a try, and show us your work...
 
  • #3
130 dB - 85 dB = 45 dB
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0 where I_0 = 1*10^-12 W/m^2
I = 10^(45/10)*10^-12 W/m^2
I = 3.16*10^-8 W/m^2

So (3.16*10^-8 W/m^2) / (10 W/m^2) = 3.16*10^-9
and (2.2 m) / (x m) = 3.16*10^-9 m
x = 6.96 * 10^8 m
which is even larger than the answer I got before >.<

Are you saying I'm actually going to use the formula I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2) here? Or 1/r^2 (which would still give an outrageous value if I plug the answer into that)?
 
  • #4
After a quick search I found the following equation:

[itex] I_{2} = I_{1}\frac{r_{1}^{2}}{r_{2}^{2}} [/itex]

See if that works?
 
  • #5
gmmstr827 said:
130 dB - 85 dB = 45 dB
I = 10^(ß/10)*I_0 where I_0 = 1*10^-12 W/m^2
I = 10^(45/10)*10^-12 W/m^2
I = 3.16*10^-8 W/m^2

So (3.16*10^-8 W/m^2) / (10 W/m^2) = 3.16*10^-9
and (2.2 m) / (x m) = 3.16*10^-9 m
x = 6.96 * 10^8 m
which is even larger than the answer I got before >.<

Are you saying I'm actually going to use the formula I_1 = I_2/(4πr^2) here? Or 1/r^2 (which would still give an outrageous value if I plug the answer into that)?

Don't worry about plugging in the power numbers. They just ask you how much farther away you need to go to be 45dB quieter.

-45dB = 10 log (I2/I1)

What is the ratio of I2 to I1?

What does that imply for the ratio of the distances from the source speaker?
 
  • #6
Clever-Name said:
After a quick search I found the following equation:

[itex] I_{2} = I_{1}\frac{r_{1}^{2}}{r_{2}^{2}} [/itex]

See if that works?

3.16*10^-8 W/m^2 = 10 W/m^2 ((2.2 m)^2 / r^2)
r = 39136.2 m

Hm, better, but still a huge distance =/
 
  • #7
berkeman said:
Don't worry about plugging in the power numbers. They just ask you how much farther away you need to go to be 45dB quieter.

-45dB = 10 log (I2/I1)

What is the ratio of I2 to I1?

What does that imply for the ratio of the distances from the source speaker?

-45dB = 10 log (I2/I1)

(3.16*10^-8 W/m^2) / (10 W/m^2) = 3.16*10^-9, or, ignoring the power numbers, 10 times the distance? So it would be 22 meters?
 
  • #8
Clever-Name said:
After a quick search I found the following equation:

[itex] I_{2} = I_{1}\frac{r_{1}^{2}}{r_{2}^{2}} [/itex]

See if that works?

gmmstr827 said:
-45dB = 10 log (I2/I1)

Use the second equation to find the ratio of the Intensities (sound powers). Then use the first equation to find the ratio of the distances. That gives you the second distance...
 
  • #9
Perhaps you mean I'm not supposed to plug in anything for I_1 and I_2? That's the only way it would make sense I suppose. Solving for that gets me a ratio of I_2 / I_1 of sqrt(10)/100000.
If I plug that into I_2 / I_1 = r_1^2 / r_2^2 with r_1 = 2.2 m, I get a distance of about 391.221 m, which looks reasonable.

So the answer is about 391.22 meters? The part I didn't understand was that I wasn't supposed to substitute anything in for I_2 / I_1 in your second equation, which wouldn't have given any variable to solve for. Thank you!
 
  • #10
gmmstr827 said:
Perhaps you mean I'm not supposed to plug in anything for I_1 and I_2? That's the only way it would make sense I suppose. Solving for that gets me a ratio of I_2 / I_1 of sqrt(10)/100000.
If I plug that into I_2 / I_1 = r_1^2 / r_2^2 with r_1 = 2.2 m, I get a distance of about 391.221 m, which looks reasonable.

So the answer is about 391.22 meters? The part I didn't understand was that I wasn't supposed to substitute anything in for I_2 / I_1 in your second equation, which wouldn't have given any variable to solve for. Thank you!

You got it. The nice thing about dB is that you can represent very large ratios with them, and still have manageable numbers.

If they had asked for the distance where the intensity was 40dB down, that is 10^4 = 10,000 times less. Square root of that is 100, so you would have been 100 times farther away than 2.2m. Since this problem listed 45dB down, the distance was a bit further than 100 times farther away.
 

FAQ: Sound diminishes from x to y over what distance?

How does sound diminish with distance?

Sound diminishes with distance due to the phenomenon of sound attenuation. This means that as sound waves travel through a medium, they lose energy and become weaker, resulting in a decrease in sound level.

What factors affect the rate of sound diminishment over distance?

The rate of sound diminishment over distance can be affected by several factors, including the type of medium the sound is traveling through, the frequency of the sound waves, and the presence of obstacles or barriers that can absorb or reflect the sound waves.

What is the relationship between sound intensity and distance?

There is an inverse relationship between sound intensity and distance. As sound waves travel further away from their source, the intensity or loudness of the sound decreases. This is because the sound energy is spread out over a larger area.

How does the speed of sound affect its diminishment over distance?

The speed of sound can affect the rate of diminishment over distance. In general, sound waves travel faster in denser mediums, such as solids, and slower in less dense mediums, such as gases. This can impact the rate at which sound waves lose energy and diminish over distance.

Can sound diminish over an infinite distance?

Technically, yes. Sound waves can continue to travel and diminish over extremely long distances, but eventually, the sound will become so faint that it cannot be detected by the human ear. This is because the energy of the sound waves is continuously being lost to the surrounding environment.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top