SPACE.com: Source of Mysterious Antimatter Found

In summary: It would be interesting if they recorded something (like a star) flying through that 'cloud'.It would be interesting if they recorded something (like a star) flying through that 'cloud'.This could be a typo for "collusions could explain GRBs?" according to the article, gamma rays, at least---
  • #1
EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,350
124
SPACE.com: "Source of Mysterious Antimatter Found"

Antimatter, which annihilates matter upon contact, seems to be rare in the universe. Still, for decades, scientists had clues that a vast cloud of antimatter lurked in space, but they did not know where it came from.

The mysterious source of this antimatter has now been discovered — stars getting ripped apart by neutron stars and black holes.

[...]

"Simple estimates suggest that about half and possibly all the antimatter is coming from X-ray binaries," said researcher Georg Weidenspointner of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany.


[...]

Weidenspointner, Skinner and their colleagues, detailed their findings in the Jan. 10 issue of the journal Nature.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20080111/sc_space/sourceofmysteriousantimatterfound
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
It would be interesting if they recorded something (like a star) flying through that 'cloud'.
 
  • #3
rewebster said:
It would be interesting if they recorded something (like a star) flying through that 'cloud'.
Whoa... I am thinking, "gamma ray bursts." :bugeye:

Does anyone think that matter-antimatter collusions could explain GRBs?
 
  • #4
according to the article, gamma rays, at least---

From the article:

"These gamma rays apparently came from a cloud of antimatter roughly 10,000 light-years across surrounding our galaxy's core."

The key word may be "apparently".
 
  • #5
The article references "a type of gamma rays" generated by matter-antimatter collusion/

So there is a type that is generated by such collusions, and other types that aren't?

I posted this as a question under Cosmology yesterday; no responses so far.
 
  • #6
"Gamma rays are very energetic photons, with energies between 1 MeV - 10 GeV."

and

"EGRET, the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope, detects gamma rays in the energy range 20 MeV - 30 GeV. "

"In its first few years of operation, the EGRET instrument completed an entire sky survey, which detected 128 sources. Some of these objects have been identified with known sources. The LMC is the only 'normal' galaxy detected by EGRET. However, 50 EGRET sources have been identified as active galactic nuclei (AGN). "

http://astrosun2.astro.cornell.edu/research/projects/SPIGOT//gamma.html

It seems like quite a range, so I would think that they may be talking about something even more specific---but I'm not a particle/astro physicist.

__________________

I don't if it is/was a typo--but, in the first line (of this post) is states that Gamma rays are in the "1 MeV - 10 GeV" and the second "detects gamma rays in the energy range 20 MeV - 30 GeV "---the two statements don't match in the same range.
 
Last edited:

Related to SPACE.com: Source of Mysterious Antimatter Found

1. What is antimatter?

Antimatter is a type of matter that has the same mass as regular matter, but has the opposite electrical charge. When antimatter and matter come into contact, they annihilate each other, producing a burst of energy.

2. How was the source of antimatter found?

The source of antimatter was found using the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), a particle detector attached to the International Space Station. The AMS detected a surplus of positrons, the antimatter counterpart to electrons, in high energy cosmic rays.

3. Why is the discovery of the source of antimatter significant?

The discovery of the source of antimatter is significant because it helps us understand the origins of the universe. According to the Big Bang theory, equal amounts of matter and antimatter were created, but most of the antimatter disappeared. By studying the source of antimatter, we can learn more about this disappearance and gain insight into the fundamental laws of physics.

4. Could antimatter be used as a source of energy?

While antimatter does have a high energy density, it is currently very difficult and expensive to produce and contain. It also poses a safety risk due to its explosive properties. Therefore, it is not currently a viable source of energy, but it is an area of ongoing research.

5. What are some potential applications of antimatter?

Aside from its potential as a source of energy, antimatter has potential applications in medical imaging and cancer treatment. It is also used in the production of PET scans, which are used to detect and diagnose diseases. Additionally, studying antimatter can help us better understand the universe and potentially lead to new technologies and advancements in physics.

Similar threads

Back
Top