Space Junk Removal: Is Laser Technology the Answer?

[satya98]

Is it a right think to use laser technology for removing space junk, what NASA is working right now.
(I think this will create severe problems in the future which we can sense)

 

[JaredJames]

OK, so what problems will this cause? Getting rid of it is a good thing.

 

[KrisOhn]

I think it is the right thing to do to bring down space junk, we have too much of it up there and it's becoming a problem. When I go out observing I probably see at least 1 satellite, that I can see, go through my FOV per 5 minutes.

What problems will bringing this stuff down cause?

 

[NlCK]

"NASA scientists have suggested shooting space junk with lasers before. But earlier plans relied on military-class lasers that would either destroy an object altogether, or vaporize part of its surface and create little plasma plumes that would rocket the piece of litter away. Those lasers would be prohibitively expensive, the team says, not to mention make other space-faring nations nervous about what exactly that military-grade laser is pointing at.""In the new study, the researchers suggest focusing a mid-powered laser through a telescope to shine on pieces of orbital debris that look like they’re on a collision course. Each photon of laser light carries a tiny amount of momentum. Together, all the photons in the beam can nudge an object in space and slow it down by about .04 inches per second."Source: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/lasering-space-junk/I included the previous information/excerpts because it's conceivably possible that you could be unfamiliar with the recently proposed methods for removing 'space junk' with lasers.

(I think this will create severe problems in the future which we can sense)

Why opt for a vague sentence instead of providing a short explanation?

 

[pmacias]

I understand the concern surrounding the use of laser technology for removing space junk. While it may seem like a quick and efficient solution, there are potential risks and consequences that need to be carefully considered.

Firstly, laser technology may not be able to effectively remove all types of space junk. Space debris comes in various sizes and shapes, and not all of them may be susceptible to laser beams. Additionally, the use of lasers could potentially create even smaller fragments of debris, which could further complicate the issue.

Furthermore, there is also the risk of damaging operational satellites or spacecraft that are still in use. Laser beams can be powerful and precise, but there is always the possibility of miscalculations or malfunctions that could cause unintended damage.

In addition to technical concerns, there are also ethical considerations to take into account. Removing space junk with lasers could be seen as a form of pollution in space, as it adds to the already significant amount of human-made objects orbiting Earth. It raises questions about our responsibility and stewardship of the space environment.

While laser technology may have its advantages, I believe it should be carefully evaluated and tested before being implemented on a large scale. It is important to consider all potential consequences and have proper regulations in place to ensure the safe and responsible use of this technology.

In conclusion, while laser technology may seem like a promising solution for removing space junk, it is crucial to thoroughly assess its potential risks and impacts before moving forward with its implementation. As scientists, it is our responsibility to consider the long-term effects and make informed decisions that prioritize the well-being of our planet and the space environment.