Spacetime distance and ruler-measured length on an XT chart

  • I
  • Thread starter KDP
  • Start date
In summary, the article discusses the concepts of spacetime distance and ruler-measured length as represented on an XT chart, which visualizes the interplay between time and space in relativistic physics. It explains how distances are measured differently in spacetime compared to classical physics, emphasizing the effects of relativity on measurements depending on the observer's frame of reference. The article highlights the importance of understanding these concepts for a deeper grasp of the nature of spacetime and the implications for physical theories.
  • #1
KDP
24
7
spacetime.png

With reference to the above diagram, we can see that if we used a ruler to measure the segments on the XT chart and added up all the segment lengths, that this ruler measured length is longer for the craft on the right which experiences the least elapsed proper time. Now unlike the regular spacetime distance (as correctly depicted in the picture) this XT chart ruler length is not invariant and different inertial observers will disagree on its length. However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance (Is there a formal name for this measurement?). Is it possible to show that this always the case or are there counter examples?

Just to be clear, I am talking about using the normal Pythagoras method of using $$ \sqrt{T^2 + X^2} $$ to calculate the segment lengths instead of the normal method of using$$\sqrt{T^2-X^2}$$ to calculate the spacetime distance segments.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
KDP said:
However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance
Consider two paths starting at the origin and ending at ##t=t_1##, ##x=\pm x_1##. The interval along each is ##t_1^2-x_1^2##, but the Euclidean length of either line drawn on the Minkowski diagram can be made longer while the other one is made shorter by a boost opposite directions. So this is a counter example to the claim that all frames agree which worldline has a longer Euclidean representation.
 
  • #3
Lets call the two paths, A and B and take the case where the first observer sees the two paths as equal and the second observer sees path A as shorter than path B. This is the outward trip. Now if they turn around so that they both return to x=0 at time t1*2, then the return path of A will be longer than that of B and by symmetry the round trip Euclidean lengths of the trips will be equal for the second observer (or any other observer) if they both return to the origin at the same time.
 
  • #4
The implication of that is tthat you have a restriction not present in your OP, that you are only considering pairs of paths that travel from one common event to another. Is that what you intended?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #5
Ibix said:
The implication of that is that you have a restriction not present in your OP, that you are only considering pairs of paths that travel from one common event to another. Is that what you intended?
You are right. That is what I intended. Sorry for not making that clear.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
KDP said:
However, from a quick check using a few examples in different reference frames, it seems that if one ruler measured chart path is longer than another in a given reference frame, then all observers will agree on which object has the longer XT chart ruler measured distance (Is there a formal name for this measurement?). Is it possible to show that this always the case or are there counter examples?

Counter-example (see screenshot):
PF-Euclid.png

Alice moves ##E_0## -> ##E_1##-> ##E_3##.
Bob moves ##E_0## -> ##E_2##-> ##E_3##.
 
  • Like
Likes KDP and Ibix
  • #7
Hi Sagittarius. You are right. I checked your figures. There are counter examples. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star

FAQ: Spacetime distance and ruler-measured length on an XT chart

What is spacetime distance in the context of an XT chart?

Spacetime distance, also known as the spacetime interval, is a measure of the separation between two events in spacetime. In an XT chart, which plots spatial position (X) against time (T), the spacetime distance is calculated using the metric of spacetime, which depends on the nature of the spacetime (e.g., Minkowski spacetime for special relativity). The interval can be time-like, space-like, or light-like, depending on the relative positions and times of the events.

How is ruler-measured length different from spacetime distance on an XT chart?

Ruler-measured length refers to the physical distance between two points in space as measured by a ruler, which does not take time into account. On an XT chart, this would correspond to the spatial separation (ΔX) between two events at the same time. In contrast, spacetime distance considers both spatial and temporal separations and is invariant under Lorentz transformations, meaning it remains the same for all observers regardless of their relative motion.

How do you calculate spacetime distance on an XT chart?

To calculate the spacetime distance (or interval) between two events on an XT chart, you use the formula for the spacetime interval in Minkowski spacetime: \( s^2 = -c^2 \Delta T^2 + \Delta X^2 \), where \( \Delta T \) is the time difference between the events, \( \Delta X \) is the spatial difference, and \( c \) is the speed of light. Depending on the sign of \( s^2 \), the interval can be classified as time-like (negative \( s^2 \)), space-like (positive \( s^2 \)), or light-like (zero \( s^2 \)).

Why is the concept of spacetime distance important in special relativity?

The concept of spacetime distance is crucial in special relativity because it remains invariant under Lorentz transformations, meaning all observers, regardless of their relative motion, will agree on the spacetime interval between two events. This invariance helps to reconcile the differences in measurements of time and space by different observers and underpins the principle that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference.

Can ruler-measured length change depending on the observer's frame of reference?

Yes, ruler-measured length can change depending on the observer's frame of reference due to the phenomenon known as length contraction. In special relativity, the length of an object moving relative to an observer will appear shorter along the direction of motion than when the object is at rest relative to the observer. This effect is a direct consequence of the Lorentz transformations

Back
Top