- #1
ShadowKraz
- 54
- 32
I had an idea about a spacetime drive that *seems* as though it is an FTL drive while trying to outline a plot for a series of sci-fi short stories set in the late 22nd-early 23rd century (possibly later as well).
Instead of working with warping space ala Star Trek or utilizing a hyperdrive to travel through higher dimensions (Asimov and Niven), it uses the curvature of spacetime to identify two points of Time that are:
A) in the objective 'present' - existing at the same temporal distance from the Big Bang and,
B) congruent in the curvature of spacetime.
A means that there is no time travel and so no Grandfather Paradoxes or violation of conservation of mass/energy.
B means that it will not work within a certain distance from a star or star system due to the variability of the gravitational influences changing the curvature of local spacetime. My thinking is that the curvature would not be static enough for the drive's computer system to be able to match the two points long enough for the drive to work. They would not remain congruent. Both end points would need to be the appropriate distance from their respective systems. Conventional physics drives (rockets, etc.) would be needed to get to and from 'flat' spacetime.
There are a lot of possiblities from here: automated freighters, 'bombers', and message capsules (or similar) would be able to transverse from star system to star system at higher velocities than any ships carrying delicate cargo (passengers, settlers, diplomats, animals, plants, etc.). Note I am also assuming, without specifying how they work (yet), constant acceleration spacecraft, 1 g for the 'delicate cargo' ships and whatever I can get away with for the automated ones.
All this also implies that not all the star systems we can easily reach with this drive are in the Milky Way galaxy. It also makes it possible to see how a galaxy or other astronomical object developed after the light that we see it with now was emitted by it, nice test of our theories and hypotheses, but I won't be trying to tackle that.
I'm thinking of calling it the Punctual Drive because that's how my sense of humor works.
What do you folks think? Is it plausible as is or do I need to think some more? Or did I sub-consciously rip off another author's idea?
Instead of working with warping space ala Star Trek or utilizing a hyperdrive to travel through higher dimensions (Asimov and Niven), it uses the curvature of spacetime to identify two points of Time that are:
A) in the objective 'present' - existing at the same temporal distance from the Big Bang and,
B) congruent in the curvature of spacetime.
A means that there is no time travel and so no Grandfather Paradoxes or violation of conservation of mass/energy.
B means that it will not work within a certain distance from a star or star system due to the variability of the gravitational influences changing the curvature of local spacetime. My thinking is that the curvature would not be static enough for the drive's computer system to be able to match the two points long enough for the drive to work. They would not remain congruent. Both end points would need to be the appropriate distance from their respective systems. Conventional physics drives (rockets, etc.) would be needed to get to and from 'flat' spacetime.
There are a lot of possiblities from here: automated freighters, 'bombers', and message capsules (or similar) would be able to transverse from star system to star system at higher velocities than any ships carrying delicate cargo (passengers, settlers, diplomats, animals, plants, etc.). Note I am also assuming, without specifying how they work (yet), constant acceleration spacecraft, 1 g for the 'delicate cargo' ships and whatever I can get away with for the automated ones.
All this also implies that not all the star systems we can easily reach with this drive are in the Milky Way galaxy. It also makes it possible to see how a galaxy or other astronomical object developed after the light that we see it with now was emitted by it, nice test of our theories and hypotheses, but I won't be trying to tackle that.
I'm thinking of calling it the Punctual Drive because that's how my sense of humor works.
What do you folks think? Is it plausible as is or do I need to think some more? Or did I sub-consciously rip off another author's idea?