MHB Sparkling's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a volume by slicing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
To find the volume of a solid with semicircular cross sections in the first quadrant, the diameter is determined by the equation D = 1/x. The volume of an individual slice is calculated as dV = (π/8)D² dx, leading to dV = (π/8)x⁻² dx. Integrating this from x = 1 to x = 4 gives the total volume V = (π/8)∫₁⁴ x⁻² dx. The final result is V = 3π/32, clarifying the discrepancy with the previously mentioned 3π/4.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to find the volume of a solid given an equation and bounds?

Let the first quadrant region enclosed by the graph of =1/x, x=1 and x=4 be the base of a solid. If cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis are semicircles, the volume of the solid is:

(Answer: 3pi/ 32)

Please tell me how you got the answer because I kept getting 3pi/4

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Sparkling,

The volume of an arbitrary semicircular slice is:

$$dV=\frac{\pi}{8}D^2\,dx$$

where the diameter $D$ is:

$$D=\frac{1}{x}$$

hence:

$$dV=\frac{\pi}{8}x^{-2}\,dx$$

And so, the sum of all the slices is given by:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{8}\int_1^4 x^{-2}\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{8}\left[-\frac{1}{x} \right]_1^4=\frac{\pi}{8}\left(1-\frac{1}{4} \right)=\frac{3\pi}{32}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top