- #36
samalkhaiat
Science Advisor
- 1,801
- 1,199
CarlB said:DID YOU READ THISWe are not yet perfectly successful. In particular, for the derivation of translational invariance, we need to assume that some background parameters,
By the way, this is NOT my example of how one can obtain Poincare invariance from a QFT that does not possesses it
Write down that Lagrangian which you do not know or have.
NO, They suggested a line of thoughts which they admit it could be wrong, because it is based on speculations.you have to play nice by admitting that Bohm and Hiley wrote a book that very clearly presented their belief that there is a preferred reference frame,
and by admitting that photons in crystals are an example of a Lie symmetry that breaks at high energy rather than low.
School kids know that when they talk about photons in crystalls, in chairs and in cows the symmetry is the Lorentz's SO(3,1).
I can only admit that you have shown everybody that your knowledge about physics and math is infinitesmal. I will be here from time to time to let everybody knows this fact about you.
bye
Last edited: