Specific heat for a triatomic gas

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the specific heat of triatomic gases using the equipartition theorem. For linear triatomic molecules, the translational degrees of freedom are three, rotational degrees are two, and vibrational degrees are typically neglected at room temperature. The internal energy is expressed as a function of the degrees of freedom, leading to confusion regarding the factor of one-half in the energy equation. The question also raises whether the specific heat would differ for non-linear molecules, hinting at the complexity of vibrational modes in such cases. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the specific heat of different molecular structures.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Using equipartition law, find specific heat of gas containing triatomic linear molecules. Will the result be different if the molecule was non- linear? In what way?

Homework Equations


According to equipartion theorem, each degree of freedom gets (1/2)kT kinetic energy and (1/2)kT potential energy.

The Attempt at a Solution


For a linear arrangement,

  • number of translational degrees of freedom is ##3##
  • number of rotational degrees of freedom is ##2## (or is it 6 because the atom can rotate about the central atom or about one of the atoms at the end)
  • number of vibrational degrees of freedom is ##1##
At room T, i will neglect point 3.

My second doubt is, the internal energy is ##\frac{1}{2}NkT\times f##

Why is it only 1/2 the value of kT (which is the sum of kinetic and potential energies as my prof says in one of the slides which i have attached below)?

In the slide, $$U=\frac{h\nu}{e^{\frac{h\nu}{kT}}-1}$$

Why isn't it $$U=\frac{h\nu}{e^{\frac{h\nu}{\frac{1}{2}\times kT}}-1}?$$
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Total number of degrees of freedom is 3n.
 
How did you get that expression?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K