Specific heat in for the Otto cycle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling the Otto cycle using ideal gas properties, specifically focusing on approximating the specific heat input (qin). The approach involves calculating the calorific value of petrol, adjusting for density and the air-fuel ratio, leading to an initial value of approximately 980.35 J. However, this value does not effectively translate to specific heat when divided by mass. The project requires optimizing the process using Excel Solver, with the compression ratio and qin as variables, indicating that the initial approximation may not significantly impact the final results. Clarification is sought on the heat introduction process in the Otto cycle and alternative methods for approaching the problem.
dinoclaro
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
A class project requires us to model the Otto cycle using ideal gas properties. We are not given the value for qin (specific heat in) and are told to make an intelligent approximation. My approach to this has been to find the calorific value of petrol, multiplying this by the density of petrol in which I then get the specific calorific value. I then proceed to multiply this by the volume of fuel in the cylinder (Volume at BDC divided by the air to fuel ratio). At the end of this process I get a value of around 980.35 J and cannot think of any way of converting this to specific heat as dividing by the mass obviously just returns the initial calorific value.

We are required to optimize the process using excel solver where the compression ratio and qin are the variables. Therefore this initial approximation has no bearing on the final optimized value (qin = 400Kj/Kg) . Although we are required to give an explanation of our initial value.

I fear that I am not understanding the Otto cycle process of where heat is introduced. Is there another way I should approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top