Spectral theory in quantum mechanics

guhan
43
1
Can someone please tell me what the integrand in the below equation mean?
1 = \langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d \langle \psi |E_\lambda \psi \rangle
where,
E_\lambda is an increasing (and absolutely continuous) function of projection operators such that \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dE_\lambda = I

( I read the integrand as a differential (or measure) of a complex constant, which should have been zero!? So I am certainly wrong in interpreting it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that E_\lambda corresponds to an element of a continuous set of projection operators i.e. E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| with the completeness relation
\int dE_\lambda\equiv \int d\lambda |\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda|=1.

In this sense the equation you wrote simply means

1=\langle\psi|\psi\rangle=\langle\psi|(\int dE_\lambda )|\psi\rangle =\int d\underbrace{\lambda\langle\psi|\lambda\rangle\langle \lambda|\psi\rangle}_{\langle \psi |E_\lambda\psi\rangle}

Hope this helps
 
Last edited:
Thanks!.. I get the drift.

As in, in the case of \lambda belonging to the spectrum of position operators,
\langle \psi | E_\lambda \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\lambda} |\psi |^2 dx
which is absolutely continuous and its differential is well defined (= | \psi |^2)

But, is writing E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| valid even for \lambda \in spectrum, which can be continuous?
I was of the opinion that it is valid only when \lambda is an eigenvalue (and hence discrete).


And when you wrote E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda|, I assume you meant the following:
E_\lambda=\sum_{\lambda_i \le \lambda} |\lambda_i\rangle\langle\lambda_i|
 
guhan said:
Thanks!.. I get the drift.

As in, in the case of \lambda belonging to the spectrum of position operators,
\langle \psi | E_\lambda \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\lambda} |\psi |^2 dx
which is absolutely continuous and its differential is well defined (= | \psi |^2)

Actually I think the answer I gave was not really what you were looking for. I just took a shot in the dark. To answer what the integrand means I would have to know in what context it appears. And I have a feeling even then I probably am not the right person to answer.

But, is writing E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| valid even for \lambda \in spectrum, which can be continuous?
I was of the opinion that it is valid only when \lambda is an eigenvalue (and hence discrete).

I think that, in a "rigged" Hilbert space, continuous eigenvalues are allowed and one can safely write E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle \lambda and even 1=\int d\lambda |\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| but I don't know how to prove this or where proof could be found.


Sorry for not being able to help you. I hope somebody comes along who can.
 
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top