Spotting gearbox assembly issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ah-E
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assembly Issues
AI Thread Summary
Understanding gearbox assembly issues requires practical experience and a strong grasp of three-dimensional visualization. Many flaws stem from parts that cannot be assembled or disassembled due to design constraints, which necessitates careful examination of technical drawings. Engaging with real mechanical components, such as junk car parts, can enhance hands-on skills and reinforce theoretical knowledge. While traditional coursework may focus on calculations, practical disassembly and reassembly can bridge knowledge gaps. Investing time in studying assembly drawings and practicing with physical parts is essential for mastering these concepts.
Ah-E
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The question might be a bit silly.. (asking for advice regarding the theory of machines content, not a homework).

I'm enrolled in the mechanical engineering bachelor's. I applied for several internships however I couldn't pass because of a particular type of questions.
The interviewer shows me an assembly for a gearbox for example, and we go through a discussion about the flaws in the shown system in general. by either spotting the errors in the dimensions or the arrangement, etc.
>>> This question is pretty similar: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/bevel-gearbox-assembly-flaws.989346/

the answers in the thread were insightful but how to gain a better understanding? any recommendations for a good book/course that I can study to cover the gap I have?
My courses in my bachelor's were pretty straightforward in this part. just do some calculations without the ability to answer those types of questions
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is definitely not a silly question. I am not aware of any good books that cover this gap in your knowledge because the test is more about practical experience than book knowledge. There are some things that you could try:

Many of the flaws in that gearbox are parts that cannot be assembled. Study the drawing carefully, and visualize how you would take it apart. Look for parts that cannot be removed because those parts could not have been assembled originally. You need to visualize the parts in three dimensions, and how they come apart. Removing bolts requires wrench access, bearings cannot be pulled over a larger diameter, etc. Expect to spend several days studying that one drawing.

Get some junk car parts - alternator, starter, transmission, differential - and take them apart. Then try to put them back together. Find somebody who has the proper tools to help you with this.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Ah-E
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
108
Views
19K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top