Why use spread operator when sorting an array in JavaScript?

In summary, the spread operator is used to efficiently create a copy of an array, as shown in the conversation. It allows for the individual elements of the array to be spread out rather than creating a new array with the original array as its only element. This is why the output differs when the spread operator is not used. The use of the spread operator is not required in the code, but it is a more efficient and preferred method for creating a copy of an array.
  • #1
shivajikobardan
674
54
TL;DR Summary
spread operator javascript
I Understand the basic theory behind spread operator.

JavaScript:
const girlNames = ['Jessica', 'Emma', 'Amandine']
const newGirlNames = [...girlNames]
console.log(newGirlNames)
// Output: ["Jessica", "Emma", "Amandine"]

But I don't understand when it's applied. See here.

JavaScript:
function createList() {
  [...richestPeople]
    .map(a => ({ value: a, sort: Math.random() }))
    .sort((a, b) => a.sort - b.sort)
    .map(a => a.value)
    .forEach((person, index) => {
      const listItem = document.createElement("li");
      listItem.setAttribute("data-index", index);
      listItem.innerHTML =
        `
    <span class="number">${index + 1}</span>
    <div class="draggable" draggable="true">
    <p class="person-name">${person}</p>
    <i class="fa-solid fa-grip-lines"></i>
    </div>

    `

      listItems.push(listItem);
      draggable_list.appendChild(listItem);
    })
}

Why do we require spread operator here? I tried to see the output w/o spread operator and seeing that didn't help.
output with spread operator:
1673710726254.png


output without spread operator:
1673710757527.png


It must be obvious to people, but it's not to me. I'm not getting it.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
  • #2
This suggests that [...arr] is an efficient way of creating a copy of the one-dimensional array arr. Without the operator, you have [arr], an array consisting of a single entry, namely arr. Hence your second screenshot has the entire list of names as a comma-separated string in a single <li> tag, rather than each name in its own <li> tag as in the first screenshot.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
shivajikobardan said:
JavaScript:
function createList() {
  [...richestPeople]
    .map(a => ({ value: a, sort: Math.random() }))
    // ...
}
Why do we require spread operator here? I tried to see the output w/o spread operator and seeing that didn't help.
You don't. The code below has exactly the same result.
JavaScript:
function createList() {
  richestPeople
    .map(a => ({ value: a, sort: Math.random() }))
    // ...
}
But note
JavaScript:
function createList() {
// This sorts the array richestPeople.
richestPeople.sort();
// This creates a new array of the elements of richestPeople and sorts it.
// richestPeople is left unsorted.
sortedRichestPeople = [...richestPeople].sort();
// This code has an identical result and is preferred by some:
sortedRichestPeople = richestPeople.slice().sort();
 

FAQ: Why use spread operator when sorting an array in JavaScript?

Why use spread operator when sorting an array in JavaScript?

Using the spread operator (...) allows us to create a shallow copy of the array, which ensures that the original array remains unchanged while sorting the copied array.

Does using the spread operator affect the performance of sorting an array in JavaScript?

Using the spread operator does have a slight performance impact as it creates a new array, but the difference is usually negligible for small to medium-sized arrays.

Can we achieve the same result without using the spread operator when sorting an array in JavaScript?

Yes, we can achieve the same result by using other methods like Array.slice() to create a copy of the array before sorting, but the spread operator provides a more concise and readable syntax.

Are there any potential drawbacks to using the spread operator when sorting an array in JavaScript?

One potential drawback is that the spread operator creates a shallow copy of the array, so if the array contains nested objects or arrays, they will still be referenced in the copied array.

Is the spread operator commonly used for sorting arrays in JavaScript?

Yes, the spread operator is a popular choice for sorting arrays in JavaScript due to its simplicity and readability, especially when combined with other array methods like sort().

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top