Spring - Pulley - Mass <Oscilations problem>

In summary, we have a system consisting of a mass M attached to a string with a spring at the other end. The string is inextensible and has a negligible mass, and there is no friction or slipping present. Given the moment of inertia of an alloy I, its radius R, and the constant of the spring k, we are asked to find the frequency of oscillation. By considering the total energy in the system, we can derive an expression for the frequency in terms of the given variables. However, further clarification and definition of all variables is needed before proceeding with the solution.
  • #1
SqueeSpleen
141
5
We have a mass M attached to a string.
In the other extreme of the string we have a spring.
We know the moment of inertia of the alloy I, and it's radius R.
We know the constant of the spring k.

The string is inextensible. String mass is negligible. There's not friction. There's no slipping. What's the frequence of the oscilation?

Attemp:
I know that the total energy in the system is:

[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2} [/itex]
As the string is inextensible, we have [itex]\Delta h = \Delta x \Leftrightarrow h-x = c[/itex]
Then, when h is at it's maximum x is at it's minimum. Also [itex]\omega = 0[/itex] at this time.
Then, by taking the following system of reference:
[itex]0 = h_{min}[/itex] and [itex]0 = x_{max}[/itex] we have that
[itex]x_{min} = -h_{max}[/itex]
[itex]\omega_{max}[/itex] is reached when [itex]h = \frac{h_{min}+h_{max}}{2} = \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex]. (Is this fine? How do I justify this? I'm guessing this movement is some of trigonometric function that's why I asserted that).
Then, as [itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}-h_{min}}{4 \pi} \frac{1}{\omega_{max} R}[/itex]
Due to the fact that [itex](a sin(b t))'= ab \frac{\nu}{2 \pi} cos(b t)[/itex], then the maximum less the minimum of one, divided by the other gives us [itex]\nu[/itex]

Now, as in our system of references we have:
[itex]U = h g m[/itex] when [itex]h=h_{max}[/itex] and when [itex]h \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex] we have:
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
Then [itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big)^{2} k = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4}) = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} = \omega [/itex]
Then
[itex]\nu = \dfrac{h_{max}}{4 \pi R \sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} }[/itex]
I recently noticed that [itex] h_{max} [/itex] isn't given.
How do I deduct it?

PD: Forgive the bad drawing, I'm not very good with sketches.
 

Attachments

  • Image.png
    Image.png
    869 bytes · Views: 600
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SqueeSpleen said:
We have a mass M attached to a string.
In the other extreme of the string we have a spring.
We know the moment of inertia of the alloy I, and it's radius R.
We know the constant of the spring k.

The string is inextensible. String mass is negligible. There's not friction. There's no slipping. What's the frequence of the oscilation?

Attemp:
I know that the total energy in the system is:

[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2} [/itex]
As the string is inextensible, we have [itex]\Delta h = \Delta x \Leftrightarrow h-x = c[/itex]
Then, when h is at it's maximum x is at it's minimum. Also [itex]\omega = 0[/itex] at this time.
Then, by taking the following system of reference:
[itex]0 = h_{min}[/itex] and [itex]0 = x_{max}[/itex] we have that
[itex]x_{min} = -h_{max}[/itex]
[itex]\omega_{max}[/itex] is reached when [itex]h = \frac{h_{min}+h_{max}}{2} = \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex]. (Is this fine? How do I justify this? I'm guessing this movement is some of trigonometric function that's why I asserted that).
Then, as [itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}-h_{min}}{4 \pi} \frac{1}{\omega_{max} R}[/itex]
Due to the fact that [itex](a sin(b t))'= ab \frac{\nu}{2 \pi} cos(b t)[/itex], then the maximum less the minimum of one, divided by the other gives us [itex]\nu[/itex]

Now, as in our system of references we have:
[itex]U = h g m[/itex] when [itex]h=h_{max}[/itex] and when [itex]h \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex] we have:
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
Then [itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big)^{2} k = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4}) = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} = \omega [/itex]
Then
[itex]\nu = \dfrac{h_{max}}{4 \pi R \sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} }[/itex]
I recently noticed that [itex] h_{max} [/itex] isn't given.
How do I deduct it?

PD: Forgive the bad drawing, I'm not very good with sketches.
Don't forget the kinetic energy of the mass.

attachment.php?attachmentid=70875&d=1403712506.png
 
  • #3
Thanks!
Then... it's something like this?
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}
+ \frac{1}{2} m R^{2} \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k = (\frac{1}{2} I + \frac{1}{2} m R^{2}) \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\dfrac{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)}{I+mR^{2}} = ( I + m R^{2}) \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\dfrac{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)}{I+mR^{2}}} = \omega[/itex]

[itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}}{4 \pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{I+mR^{2}}{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)} } = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{h_{max}(I+mR^{2})}{ gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k} }[/itex]
 
  • #4
It's the following expression which needs the kinetic energy of the mass added.
SqueeSpleen said:
[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2} [/itex]

In the end, the frequency is independent of hmax.

You really need to define all of your variables.


Is there a particular reason to do the problem using energy rather than force?
 
  • #5
I tought it would be easier, only that =/ but now I think energy isn't the right approach.
 
  • #6
This would depend a bit on how you do it. If using Lagrange mechanics (which I would apply by default to problems of this type), energy considerations are the way to go. In the end, the result should of course be independent of how you do it.
 

FAQ: Spring - Pulley - Mass <Oscilations problem>

What is the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem?

The "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem is a classic physics problem that involves a spring, a pulley, and a mass. It typically asks for the calculation of the oscillation frequency of the mass when it is attached to a spring and connected to a pulley system. It is commonly used to illustrate concepts of mechanical energy, simple harmonic motion, and conservation of energy.

What are the key components of the problem?

The key components of the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem are a spring, a pulley, and a mass. The spring is typically assumed to be ideal, meaning it follows Hooke's Law and has no mass. The pulley is also assumed to be ideal, meaning it has no mass and no friction. The mass is the object that is attached to the spring and connected to the pulley system.

How do you solve the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem?

To solve the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem, you can use the equations of motion for simple harmonic motion and conservation of energy. First, write down the equations for the forces acting on the mass, including the spring force and the force due to gravity. Then, use these equations to solve for the acceleration and displacement of the mass. Finally, use the equation for conservation of energy to find the frequency of oscillation.

What are some real-world applications of the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem?

The "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem has many real-world applications in fields such as engineering, physics, and mechanics. It can be used to model the motion of a mass attached to a spring, such as a car's suspension system or a door closer. It can also be used to study the behavior of pendulums, which are commonly used in clocks and metronomes.

What are some common misconceptions about the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem?

One common misconception about the "Spring - Pulley - Mass" problem is that the mass will continue to oscillate forever once it is set in motion. In reality, there is always some friction present in a physical system, causing the oscillations to eventually dampen and stop. Another misconception is that the frequency of oscillation is affected by the mass of the object. In fact, the frequency only depends on the stiffness of the spring and the mass attached to it, not the mass of the object being oscillated.

Back
Top