Squaring each side of the equation

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date
In summary: This is why we need to square both sides of an equation in order to solve for a real root: to make sure that we are getting a real number, and not an imaginary one.In summary, because you squared both the sides you got one erroneous root x = -2 gives the LHS -ve but RHS is positive and so this is not solutionnote that $2^2 = (-2)^2 = 4$ but $\sqrt{4} = 2$
  • #1
Yankel
395
0
Hello all,

I am working on a calculus problem, of finding a local min and max of a function with 2 variables. During my solution, I have encountered an algebraic issue, maybe you could assist.

I am trying to solve the equation:

\[7x-1=\sqrt{56x^{2}-16x-31}\]

If I let MAPLE solve it, I get one solution: x=16/7, which is identical to the solution in the book (one critical point in the calculus view).

What I did from here, is:

\[(7x-1)^{2}=56x^{2}-16x-31\]The solution I got to that, which is what MAPLE gives to that, is two points: x=16/7 and x=-2.

I don't see what I did wrong here, I used the power on both sides, on the entire side, and not on elements, like you should do. Can you help ?

If you are curious, the function is:

\[f(x,y)=\sqrt{56x^{2}-8y^{2}-16x-31}+1-8x\]Many thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yankel said:
Hello all,

I am working on a calculus problem, of finding a local min and max of a function with 2 variables. During my solution, I have encountered an algebraic issue, maybe you could assist.

I am trying to solve the equation:

\[7x-1=\sqrt{56x^{2}-16x-31}\]

If I let MAPLE solve it, I get one solution: x=16/7, which is identical to the solution in the book (one critical point in the calculus view).

What I did from here, is:

\[(7x-1)^{2}=56x^{2}-16x-31\]The solution I got to that, which is what MAPLE gives to that, is two points: x=16/7 and x=-2.

I don't see what I did wrong here, I used the power on both sides, on the entire side, and not on elements, like you should do. Can you help ?

If you are curious, the function is:

\[f(x,y)=\sqrt{56x^{2}-8y^{2}-16x-31}+1-8x\]Many thanks !

because you squared both the sides you got one erroneous root x = -2 gives the LHS -ve but RHS is positive and so this is not solution

note that $2^2 = (-2)^2 = 4$ but $\sqrt{4} = 2$
 
  • #3
I am not sure I get it, why not:

\[\sqrt{4}=\pm 2\]

?

I understand that if I put x=-2 before squaring, there is no solution.

But how can you know when to square and not to square ?

From solving inequalities with roots, I know that you can square as long as you do it on the entire LHS and the entire RHS.

How would you solve it ?
 
  • #4
Yankel said:
I am not sure I get it, why not:

\[\sqrt{4}=\pm 2\]

?

I understand that if I put x=-2 before squaring, there is no solution.

But how can you know when to square and not to square ?

From solving inequalities with roots, I know that you can square as long as you do it on the entire LHS and the entire RHS.

How would you solve it ?

For real solution, \(\sqrt{y}\geq 0\). When x =-2, \(7x - 1 = -15 < 0\). So then you have \(-15 = \sqrt{y}\) but how can this be when the sqrt is greater than or equal to 0?
 
  • #5
By convention, $\sqrt{a}$ always means the non-negative root.

The reason why we do this is so that we can talk about the function $f$, where:

$f(x) = \sqrt{x}$.

Now the squaring function (the parabola $g(x) = x^2$) is not one-to-one, it obviously takes $-a$ and $a$ to the same image ($a^2$). So when we square, we get two possible ways to "unsquare", so we ALWAYS have to check if the two possibilities we get when we solve by "taking squares" fit the original problem.

One sees this a lot in mathematical modelling of physical problems, where often the "answer" is meant to be some dimensional entity, like length or area. If we get a negative answer, after squaring somewhere, it is typically discarded as "extraneous" (saying something is -5 cm long doesn't make too much sense).

With "abstract problems" involving functions, it is not often clear WHICH solution is "the right one", and both may be viable candidates. This is often true in situations involving angles, where a negative angle might mean "reflection from below" instead of "reflection from above".

With REAL numbers, we have a way of distinguishing one square root as "bigger" (since the real numbers are ORDERED), which gives a clear way of picking a "preferred" square root: the bigger one (the positive one). This turns out to be fantastically UNTRUE in the complex numbers, leading to such amusing things as:

$1 = \sqrt{1} = \sqrt{(-1)(-1)} = \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1} = i^2 = -1$

(the problem here is two-fold: first $\sqrt{(-1)} = \pm i$ so the next to last statement is suspect, and also $\sqrt{1} = \pm 1$ so the first statement is suspect, we deliberately choose "the wrong square root" at the start to make it seem as if the impossible $1 = -1$ might plausibly be true. Because of this, the "rule":$\sqrt{ab} = \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}$

is not allowed for complex numbers, except in certain very special circumstances (typically $a,b \in \Bbb R^+_0$), there's too many ways in which it can be abused).

Put another way:

if $A = B$, then certainly $A^2 = B^2$, but if we START with:

$A^2 = B^2$, we do not know if $A = B$, or $A = -B$.
 

FAQ: Squaring each side of the equation

What is meant by "squaring each side of the equation"?

When we say "squaring each side of the equation", we mean raising both sides of the equation to the power of two. This allows us to solve for the variable in the equation.

Why do we square each side of the equation?

Squaring each side of the equation allows us to eliminate any square roots or fractional exponents that may be present in the equation. This simplifies the equation and makes it easier to solve.

Does squaring each side of the equation change the solution?

Yes, squaring each side of the equation may change the solution. This is because when we square both sides, we are essentially introducing extraneous solutions. It is important to check the solutions obtained after squaring to ensure they are valid for the original equation.

Can we square each side of the equation if it contains variables?

Yes, we can square each side of the equation even if it contains variables. However, we must be careful to consider the domain of the variable and check for any extraneous solutions that may arise.

Are there any other methods for solving equations besides squaring each side?

Yes, there are other methods for solving equations such as factoring, completing the square, and using the quadratic formula. The method used will depend on the type of equation and the specific situation. It is important to choose the most efficient method for solving each equation.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
920
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top