Star formation rates z=6 to z=10

In summary, the authors discuss the use of HST ACS and NICMOS data to study the formation and evolution of galaxies during the first 1-2 Gyrs of the universe. Their sample of 506 z~6 objects reveals strong evidence for evolution in the UV luminosity function (LF), with the characteristic luminosity doubling over the interval z~6 to z~3. They also find a shift to lower luminosities at higher redshifts, with the bright end of the LF being 5 times lower at z~10 compared to z~4. The authors also mention the potential for further advancements in this area with the use of high sensitivity WFC3 and NIRCam.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510697

Authors: Rychard J. Bouwens (UCSC), Garth D. Illingworth (UCSC)
Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures. Conference proceedings for The Fabulous Destiny of Galaxies: Bridging Past and Present, Marseille, June 2005

HST ACS and NICMOS data are now of sufficient depth and areal coverage to place strong constraints on the formation and evolution of galaxies during the first 1-2 Gyrs of the universe. Of particular interest are galaxies at z~6 since they represent the earliest epoch accessible by current high-efficiency optical instrumentation. To this end, we have constructed a sample of 506 z~6 objects from all the deepest wide-area HST data (UDF, UDF-Parallel, and GOODS fields). They have been used to construct an optimal determination of the rest-frame continuum UV LF at z~6. Our LF extends to over 3 magnitudes below L*, fainter than has been done at z~3. Over the interval z~6 to z~3, we find strong evidence for evolution in the UV LF. Though constraints on the faint-end slope remain modest (and are consistent with no-evolution), the characteristic luminosity appears to have approximately doubled over the interval z~6 to z~3, consistent with hierarchical expectations. Remarkably, this shift to lower luminosities extends to even higher redshifts. Using all deep J+H NICMOS observations (800 orbits in total), we have been able to demonstrate that the bright end of the LF (>0.3L*) is at least 5 times lower at z~10 than at z~4, with a similar deficit being established from our recent detections and first statistical sample of z~7-8 galaxies using our UDF NICMOS data. In these proceedings, we discuss what is known about the UV LF and UV luminosity density at z~6-10 from current data and its evolution relative to z~3. We also describe several exciting prospects for advance in this area over the next year.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't wait for the high sensitivity WFC3 and NIRCam :biggrin:
 

Related to Star formation rates z=6 to z=10

1. What is the significance of studying star formation rates at z=6 to z=10?

Studying star formation rates at this range allows us to understand the early stages of the universe and how galaxies formed. It also provides insight into the evolution of galaxies and the processes that drive star formation.

2. How do scientists measure star formation rates at z=6 to z=10?

Scientists use a combination of techniques, such as measuring the brightness of galaxies and analyzing the spectra of their light, to estimate the amount of new stars being formed in a given time period.

3. What factors affect the star formation rates at z=6 to z=10?

Several factors can influence star formation rates, including the availability of gas and dust, the presence of mergers or collisions between galaxies, and the rate of star formation in nearby galaxies.

4. What challenges do scientists face when studying star formation rates at z=6 to z=10?

Some challenges include the limited availability of data, as these galaxies are located at very large distances, making it difficult to observe and study them in detail. Another challenge is the uncertainty in the methods used to measure star formation rates.

5. How have star formation rates at z=6 to z=10 changed over time?

Based on current research, it appears that star formation rates were much higher during this time period compared to the present day. However, more studies are needed to fully understand the changes in star formation rates over time at these redshifts.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top