State and prove a natural generalization

In summary, the task is to prove the AG Inequality for any positive real numbers, with a hint that the same method used for the case of three numbers may also work for the general case or proof by induction can be used.
  • #1
major_maths
30
0

Homework Statement


State and prove a natural generalization of "prove that for any three positive real numbers x1, x2, x3, x1/x2 + x2/x3 + x3/x1 [itex]\geq[/itex] 3.


Homework Equations


AG Inequality is used in subproof (x1/x2 + x2/x3 + x3/x1 [itex]\geq[/itex] 3)


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what the book means exactly by a "natural generalization". Does it want me to prove the original AG Inequality or relate it somehow to this specific instance of the AG Inequality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's special about the statement being true for 3 numbers? Is it true that for any 4 positive real numbers [itex] x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4[/itex]
[tex]
\frac{x_1}{x_2}+\frac{x_2}{x_3}+\frac{x_3}{x_4}+ \frac{x_4}{x_1} \geq 4 \; ?
[/tex]
Can you generalize?
 
  • #3
So it's asking for a proof of the form (x1+x2+...+xn)/n [itex]\geq[/itex] [itex]\sqrt[n]{x1x2...xn}[/itex] . So, I should prove the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
major_maths said:
So it's asking for a proof of the form (x1+x2+...+xn)/n [itex]\geq[/itex] [itex]\sqrt[n]{x1x2...xn}[/itex] . So, I should prove the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality?

If by "of the form," you mean for [itex] n [/itex] positive real numbers, then yes. I'm guessing the same trick you used for the [itex] n=3[/itex] case will work in general. If not, proof by induction might work.
 

FAQ: State and prove a natural generalization

What is the definition of a natural generalization?

A natural generalization is a statement that applies to a broad range of cases based on a limited set of observations or data. It is a hypothesis that has been tested and proven to be true in various situations.

How do you prove a natural generalization?

In order to prove a natural generalization, you must collect and analyze a significant amount of data and observations. You must then use this evidence to support your hypothesis and show that it applies to a wide range of cases.

What makes a natural generalization valid?

A natural generalization is considered valid if it has been proven to be true in multiple cases and can be applied to a wide range of situations. It must also be supported by evidence and cannot be disproven.

Can a natural generalization ever be proven wrong?

While a natural generalization can be disproven, it is unlikely as it is based on a significant amount of evidence and observations. However, new evidence or data may emerge that can disprove a previously accepted natural generalization.

How is a natural generalization different from a law or theory?

A natural generalization is a statement that is based on a limited set of data and observations, whereas a law or theory is a well-established and extensively tested scientific principle. A natural generalization is also not as universally accepted as a law or theory, which may have more conclusive evidence to support it.

Similar threads

Back
Top