MHB State the range of the reciprocal function?

AI Thread Summary
The range of the reciprocal function g(x) = -1/((x+3)^2 + 1) is determined to be y ≤ 0, with the maximum value approaching 0 as x approaches ±∞. The function has a horizontal asymptote at the x-axis and is symmetric about the line x = -3. To graph the function, the minimum occurs when the denominator is at its smallest, which is at the vertex of the original function f(x). The discussion confirms that the initial assessment of the range was correct. Overall, the reciprocal function exhibits specific behavior that can be accurately graphed based on these characteristics.
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
State the range of the reciprocal function of f(x) = - (x+3)^2 - 1.

I'm not sure if I did this right. I wrote that y is above/equal to -1 and below/equal to 0. Is this correct?

Also, how would you graph the reciprocal function of f(x) if there is no VA and only a HA?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We could write the reciprocal function $g$ as:

$$g(x)=\frac{1}{f(x)}=-\frac{1}{(x+3)^2+1}$$

Now, to find the rage of $g$, I would write:

$$y=-\frac{1}{(x+3)^2+1}=-\frac{1}{x^2+6x+10}$$

Now, express this equation in standard form as a quadratic in $x$, and then require the discriminant to be non-negative...this will result in an inequality which gives the range of the reciprocal function. You will find that you are correct.

To graph, consider that $g$ is the graph of $$y=-\frac{1}{x^2+1}$$, shifted 3 units to the left. This function is even, meaning it is symmetric about the $y$-axis, so $g$ will be symmetric across $x=-3$. It has as its maximum value that place where the denominator is the largest (because it is a negative reciprocal), which is the end-behavior, that is where x goes to $\pm\infty$. So, we know the $x$-axis is the horizontal asymptote. It has as its minimum value the place where the denominator is the smallest, that is, where the squared term is zero.

You now have enough information to construct a reasonably accurate graph. It should look like:

View attachment 3416
 

Attachments

  • reciprocal.png
    reciprocal.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 118
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top