Static electricity shock: Can it ever be lethal?

In summary, it is possible to charge oneself with enough static to be lethal or cause significant damage, especially in a dry climate. Materials other than carpets can also cause a buildup of static, such as the van de graff generator. However, the size and capacitance of the generator will determine the amount of charge stored. Other factors, such as the path of the discharge and the duration of the shock, also play a role in the potential damage caused. Additionally, certain activities, like filling a tank in an explosive environment, can increase the risk of electrocution. Overall, it is important to be cautious around high voltage sources and to properly ground oneself to avoid potential harm.
  • #36
nsaspook said:
I've seen it many times during landings on metal decks but typically with shipboard combat cargo the bird never lands, you hook the sling to the underside cargo hook.

What happens on oil-rigs, carrier-decks, LNG carrier helipads etc. where there's a good chance of flammable ignition? Are special precautions needed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
rollingstein said:
Do the ramp guys at airports have to face a similar sting from aircraft coming to the airbridge?

I'd imagine an aircraft having several times the charge buildup potential as a helicopter. In terms or total area, speed & time aloft.

Is the contact through rubber tyres enough to discharge the static?

I'm going to guess that it is fairly easy to discharge the buildup safely - there's plenty of time and methods to do so with a plane that lands on a runway.

A helicopter is unique in that its first contact can be with humans while it is still fully insulated from the ground.
 
  • #38
rollingstein said:
I don't understand the electronics involved but was this static or related to the circuitry that drives your antenna? I mean, you must have a power source to get that antenna to radiate, right? Could that be the source?

Jake didn't say what was the weather that day.

I once (and only once) experienced sizzling and static electricity about ten miles ahead of a thunderstorm in the gulfstream. Had it been nighttime I'm sure we'd have seen St Elmo's Fire... old sea stories speak of it a lot.

elmo.jpg


http://s2.photobucket.com/user/danolson/media/Blog stuff/elmo.jpg.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Elmo's_fire
 
  • #39
DaveC426913 said:
I'm going to guess that it is fairly easy to discharge the buildup safely - there's plenty of time and methods to do so with a plane that lands on a runway.

What methods do you have in mind?

I don't recall any conductive path touching the airframe prior to the rampie opening the door. (unless the tire resistance is low enough to provide a good ground. Is it?)
 
  • #40
jim hardy said:
I once (and only once) experienced sizzling and static electricity about ten miles ahead of a thunderstorm in the gulfstream. Had it been nighttime I'm sure we'd have seen St Elmo's Fire... old sea stories speak of it a lot.

Just got me thinking: What about air-to-air refuelling ops?

Is there a roaring spark from the tanker plane? With a plane's large body I suppose the sparking potential is a 100x higher than a puny helicopter?

It might be a real risk there with tens of thousands of gallons of highy flamabble fuel in close range.
 
  • #41
rollingstein said:
What methods do you have in mind?

I don't recall any conductive path touching the airframe prior to the rampie opening the door. (unless the tire resistance is low enough to provide a good ground. Is it?)

Most aircraft have static 'wicks' to reduce static charges. Most of residual charge is dissipated into the ground when landing but grounding is always used during fueling.

 
  • #42
rollingstein said:
I don't understand the electronics involved but was this static or related to the circuitry that drives your antenna? I mean, you must have a power source to get that antenna to radiate, right? Could that be the source?

We were using an antenna matching network and feeding it with a 50 ohm transceiver. We were not transmitting. The static was building up due to the wind blowing across the wire hanging from the kite and probably getting amplified by the fact that some of the insulated wire was in the water. The wire was slack while we were retrieving it. I suspect it formed a capacitor with the water, amplifying the static charge significantly.
 
  • #43
JakeBrodskyPE said:
We were using an antenna matching network and feeding it with a 50 ohm transceiver. We were not transmitting. The static was building up due to the wind blowing across the wire hanging from the kite and probably getting amplified by the fact that some of the insulated wire was in the water. The wire was slack while we were retrieving it. I suspect it formed a capacitor with the water, amplifying the static charge significantly.

Very interesting observations.
 
  • #44
Jet fuel is not "flammable" at temperatures below 100F (that temperature is the flash point of Jet A). You have to have ambient temperatures above the flash point so that the partial pressure of the fuel (usually a mixture of diesel and kerosene) in air in order to form a combustible fuel air mixture. By definition fuels that are normally used below their flash point are labeled combustible not flammable. I am fairly certain that the refueling boom is in electrical contact (no sparks) before the fuel valve is opened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel#Jet_A

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_point

Regards,
Chris
 
  • #45
rootone said:
Sitting on top of a van de graff generator then jumping on to the floor would be definitely be unhealthy for you.
Well, if you leave the VdG generator before you touch the floor, then no circuit has been made, no electricity will flow but you might twist your ankle if you land funny.
 
  • #46
variation32 said:
Well, if you leave the VdG generator before you touch the floor, then no circuit has been made, no electricity will flow but you might twist your ankle if you land funny.

I went to on a date with a friend to the local Science museum yesterday evening. (Adults only. Oh my god. Booze and Science...)
Anyways, one of the exhibits was the infamous big hair Van de Graaff experiment:
4-1-OMSIBAND.jpg

Although I didn't take my camera, this is an image of the actual generator.

So, the trick was, that the big haired person stood on a plastic milk crate, with a layer of rubber on top of the milk crate.
Insulation!

The first person we watched, ended up looking just like the lady above.

The next person, fortunately, had two semi-tipsy friends, who were not standing on the milk-crate-rubber-mat device, who would touch the sphere every 10 seconds or so, creating, even for a hard of hearing person like myself, an audible "ZAP!".
So science experiment person #2, never got her hair to stand on end.

But everyone laughed, and no one died. So, IMHO, it was a grand experiment.
 
  • #47
ps. The setup, is apparently set up, such that it is safe, for non-inebriated children.

how.to.make.electrostatics.nonlethal.to.children.jpg


Always a good thing. :smile:
 
Back
Top