- #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
- 3,926
- 262
Homework Statement
I am trying to solve a problem but I am confused on what's going on with an approximation.
I have to find the pressure in function of V, T and N of an ideal gas using the partition function, then obtain the chemical potential in function of T, p and N and I must graph it in function of T. I'm having trouble with the chemical potential.
Homework Equations
[itex]C^N=h^{3N}N![/itex] because the particles that make up the gas are indistinguishable.
Partition function: ##Z_N(T,V)=\frac{1}{C^N} \int _\Gamma dx_1dy_1dz_1...dx_Ndy_Ndz_Ndp1_xdp1_ydp1_z...dpN_xdpN_ydpN_z \exp \left ( -\beta \sum _{i=1}^N \frac{pi_x^2+pi_y^2+pi_z^2}{2m} \right )##
Helmholtz free energy: ##A=-kT\ln (Z_N(T,V))##.
Pressure: ##p=-\left ( \frac{\partial A}{\partial V} \right ) _{T,N}##
Chem. potential: ##\mu (T,V,N)=\left ( \frac{\partial A}{\partial N} \right ) _{(T,V)}##
The Attempt at a Solution
Using the relevant equations I calculated ##A(T,V,N)=-kT\ln \left ( \frac{V}{C^N} \left ( \frac{2\pi m}{\beta} \right ) ^{3/2} \right )## which gave me the famous ##P=\frac{kNT}{V}## so there are chances that I got the Helmholtz free energy right.
Now the problem begins for the chem. potential.
In order to calculate mu, I want to express A in terms of N explicitely. I got ##A(T,V,N)=-kNT \{ \ln \left [ V \left ( \frac{2m \pi}{\beta} \right ) ^{3/2} \right ] -\ln (h^3) - \frac{1}{N}\ln (N!) \}##
I must derivate this with respect to N so I guess it is convenient to use Stirling's approximation. If so, I get ##\mu (T,V,N) \approx -k T - \{ kT \ln \left [ \frac{V}{h^3N} \left ( \frac{2m \pi}{\beta} \right ) ^{3/2} \right ] -\frac{kT}{N} \}##. And here is where I'm desperate. Since N is enormous I get a non sensical result (natural logarithm of 0).
So I don't know if I did something wrong somewhere... Maybe there was no need to use Stirling's approximation? Hmm.
Any help is appreciated.
Last edited: