- #36
A.T.
Science Advisor
- 12,554
- 3,687
I don't find this challenge by Arthur Baraov very convincing so far:enrroi said:The conclusion of last update on that link, Oct 1 2019 by Arthur Baraov, is challenging and is not being addressed by Tao: "Equating Dzhanibekov effect with the tennis racket instability is a blunder. So, the real physical cause for the instability of the Dzhanibekov top needs to be identified. " It would be interesting to perform the experience in microgravity and vacuum conditions to sort this out.
- He is basing it on the nut + clay experiment, which is not shown performed in the video, just animated based on descriptions.
- According to the video the clay was attached to the wingnut originally used to observe the flip, not to a mere "regular hexagon nut" as he claims. So his assumptions about the principal moments of inertia might be off.
- Even ignoring the above, it seems that the "violation of the intermediate axis theorem" would rather be a violation of the "extension of the intermediate axis theorem" that he proposes himself in the post.