Strange result in lab possibly electrochem related?

In this case, it is possible that the ions in the solution are providing the necessary electrons for the plating reaction to occur.
  • #1
caracole
2
0

Homework Statement


In a recent lab (our labs are very open ended) my group decided to make 5 different concentrations of CuSO4. We measured out between .5 g and 10 g of solid CuSO4 (the pentahydrate kind) into 100mL of water each, dropped a .35 piece of heavy copper foil into each (about 1cmx3cm, maybe smaller), then let all 5 solutions sit for almost a month in a hood with parafilm on top. We also measured the absorbance spectrum of the liquid.

After about one week, the copper foil in the most dilute solutions started to form a slight redish/brown patina. But at this time, there was no measurable difference in the absorbance spectrum of the liquid.

After two weeks, the copper in the most dilute solutions started getting a blue/green chalky looking substance on it. However, the foil in the most concentrated solutions started to get a red shimmery look to it.

Two more weeks and half the foil pieces are covered in this blue/greed stuff and the copper from the two most concentrated solutions are red and sparkley.

We looked at both under a microscope, the red one looks like reddish crystals or copper that was plated onto the foil. It's pretty easy to scrape the red stuff off. The green stuff is also pretty easy to scrape off, it still looks chalky under the microscope, and not shiny at all.

We think the blue green is Cu(OH)2.
We thought the red stuff was either copper plated onto the foil or Cu2O crystals (or some combination?) Cu2O is soluble in acid so we put the foil strip into some 1M acid and nothing dramatic happened, but it did seem a little less red, and a little less sparkley (though still there was something different about the foil).

No significant weight change for any of the foil pieces given the accuracy of our scale :-(

So, my questions (finally) are: Why would something different happen in the concentrated solutions than the dilute ones? How would I have been able to predict this? Is there any other way to tell whether it is more likely that I made Cu2O or plated more metal onto the foil? Don't you need electricity to plate metal onto things? where would the extra electrons come from?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The difference in the reaction between the dilute and concentrated solutions is likely due to the fact that concentrated solutions have higher concentrations of reactants, so the reaction will proceed at a faster rate than in dilute solutions. This means that the copper foil in the concentrated solutions will be reacting more quickly and may produce different products than in the dilute solutions. In order to predict this phenomenon, you would need to know the exact reaction that is happening between the copper foil and the CuSO4 solution. It is likely that the reaction is some form of oxidation/reduction reaction, as the copper will be reacting with the ions in the CuSO4 solution. Knowing the exact reaction and the products that it forms will help you predict what will happen in the different concentrations of solution. In order to determine whether the red substance on the foil is copper plating or Cu2O crystals, you could try submerging the foil in an acid solution. If the red substance dissolves in the acid, then it is likely Cu2O. If it does not dissolve, then it is likely copper plating. In order for metal to be plated onto a surface, electricity is generally required. The electrons necessary for the reaction come from the electric current.
 

FAQ: Strange result in lab possibly electrochem related?

What is electrochemistry and how does it relate to this strange result in the lab?

Electrochemistry is the study of chemical reactions that involve the transfer of electrons. This field of science is closely related to this strange result in the lab because it often involves the use of electricity to drive chemical reactions.

What could be causing this strange result in the lab?

There are many potential factors that could be causing this strange result in the lab, such as contaminants in the materials being used, errors in the experimental setup, or unexpected chemical reactions. Further investigation and analysis will be needed to determine the exact cause.

How can we verify the accuracy of this strange result in the lab?

One way to verify the accuracy of the result is to repeat the experiment multiple times to ensure consistency. Additionally, using controls and a standardized experimental procedure can help to rule out any potential sources of error.

Is this strange result in the lab a significant finding, or just a fluke?

It is important to carefully analyze and interpret the results to determine if they are statistically significant and reproducible. If the result is unexpected and cannot be explained by known theories or previous research, it may be considered a significant finding.

What steps should be taken next to further investigate this strange result in the lab?

Further experimentation, analysis, and collaboration with other scientists can help to uncover the cause and implications of this strange result in the lab. It may also be helpful to review the experimental design and consider other potential variables that could be affecting the results.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
108K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top