Strange Result of Error Calculation

In summary, the conversation discussed an experiment conducted on the bending of X-Rays in crystals, using a NaCl crystal with a specific d-value. The K_{\alpha} and K_{\beta} lines were determined using the Bragg equation, and the error of theta was found to be 0.3 degrees. However, when the values were inserted into the equation, the resulting errors were much higher than expected. After further investigation and conversion of \delta\theta to radians, a new and more accurate error value was obtained.
  • #1
Lunar_Lander
38
0

Homework Statement



We conducted an experiment on the bending of X-Rays in crystals and determined the [tex]K_{\alpha},K_{\beta}[/tex] lines of the first order and the corresponding wavelenghts of the radiation by means of the Bragg equation. We used a NaCl crystal with a d=283 pm. We determined the error of theta to be 0.3 degrees. Our two wavelenghts for the two lines were then 64 and 72 pm respectively. Inserting the respective values into the second equation given under (2) to obtain the errors, results in strange high errors, such as 100 pm.

Homework Equations



[tex]\lambda=\frac{2d \cdot \sin(\theta)}{n}[/tex]
[tex]\delta\lambda=\frac{2d \cdot \cos(\theta)}{n} \cdot d\theta[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Comparison with a similar lab report (where the wavelenghts were 72 pm and the error of theta 0.2 degrees) showed that when I inserted their values, I also obtained errors of about 100 pm instead of the 1 pm they had obtained as a result. I cannot understand why using the same formula with the same variables gives numbers which deviate by a factor of 100.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you converted [tex]\delta\theta[/tex] to radians?
 
  • #3
I now did and now I calculated the new [tex]\delta\theta=5.24~mrad[/tex]. With that I get [tex]\delta\lambda=2.9~pm[/tex]. Thanks!
 

FAQ: Strange Result of Error Calculation

What is the "strange result" of error calculation?

The "strange result" of error calculation refers to an outcome that is unexpected or unusual from what is typically seen in the data. It can also refer to an error value that is significantly different from the expected or assumed value.

Why does the "strange result" occur in error calculation?

The "strange result" can occur in error calculation due to various factors such as human error, instrument malfunction, or incorrect assumptions made during the calculation process.

How can we prevent or minimize the occurrence of "strange results" in error calculation?

To prevent or minimize the occurrence of "strange results" in error calculation, it is important to ensure that all measurements and calculations are done accurately and carefully. It is also essential to double-check all assumptions and data before performing the calculation.

What are the potential impacts of "strange results" in error calculation on the overall scientific findings?

The "strange results" can have significant impacts on the overall scientific findings as they can lead to incorrect conclusions or interpretations. It can also affect the validity and reliability of the research results.

How can we address or explain the "strange results" in error calculation in our scientific research?

In case of "strange results" in error calculation, it is important to thoroughly analyze the data and identify the potential sources of error. This can help in explaining the unusual outcome and providing a more accurate and reliable conclusion to the research. Additionally, repeating the experiment or calculation can also help in validating the results and identifying any errors.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top