- #1
Dell
- 590
- 0
in the following question, how do i find the changle in AB, the change in AD and the change in AC?
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_H4Iz7SmBrbk/Sv_hYT83rYI/AAAAAAAAB8s/7l5YRXMxVfQ/s912/Capture.JP what i have done is used the following
[tex]\sigma[/tex]xx=E*[tex]\epsilon[/tex]xx
[tex]\delta[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB*AB
since AB is on the x axis,
[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]xx=[tex]\sigma[/tex]xx/E=150000000/200000000000=3/400
[tex]\delta[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB*AB=(3/400)*100*10^-5=75[tex]\mu[/tex]m
but, 1st of all this is wrong! the correct answer is meant to be 60[tex]\mu[/tex]m, and second of all it seems too simple, why would [tex]\nu[/tex]=0.3 be given if i don't use it?
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_H4Iz7SmBrbk/Sv_hYT83rYI/AAAAAAAAB8s/7l5YRXMxVfQ/s912/Capture.JP what i have done is used the following
[tex]\sigma[/tex]xx=E*[tex]\epsilon[/tex]xx
[tex]\delta[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB*AB
since AB is on the x axis,
[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]xx=[tex]\sigma[/tex]xx/E=150000000/200000000000=3/400
[tex]\delta[/tex]AB=[tex]\epsilon[/tex]AB*AB=(3/400)*100*10^-5=75[tex]\mu[/tex]m
but, 1st of all this is wrong! the correct answer is meant to be 60[tex]\mu[/tex]m, and second of all it seems too simple, why would [tex]\nu[/tex]=0.3 be given if i don't use it?
Last edited by a moderator: