Struggling with Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf-like formulas

  • Thread starter luisgml_2000
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Formulas
In summary, to prove e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^\dagger)e^{-\alpha a}=f(a,a^\dagger+\alpha), where a and a^\dagger represent the annihilation and creation operators of the quantum harmonic oscillator, it is necessary to use the Hadamard Lemma and consider the unitary transformation f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}. This transformation results in a displacement of \alpha in the second argument of f, without the need for a Taylor series.
  • #1
luisgml_2000
49
0

Homework Statement



I have been asked to prove [tex]e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^\dagger)e^{-\alpha a}=f(a,a^\dagger+\alpha)[/tex], where [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]a^\dagger[/tex] represent the annihilation and creation operators of the quantum harmonic oscillator, respectively.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only thing I have done is to use the Hadamard Lemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff_formula). Any ideas will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
gabbagabbahey said:
That seems like a good place to start...what do you get when you do that?

I get

[tex]e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^\dagger)e^{-\alpha a}=f(a,a^\dagger)+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,f(a,a^\dagger)]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,f(a,a^\dagger)]]+\ldots[/tex]

but I don't know what to do next.
 
  • #4
It seems that I have to apply some kind of Taylor expansion but I'm not sure on how to do this.
 
  • #5
Hint: Consider [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})=a^{\dagger}[/itex] and [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})=a[/itex]...what do these considerations tell you about the unitary transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
[tex]
e^{\alpha a}a^\dagger e^{-\alpha a}=a^\dagger+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,a^\dagger]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,a^\dagger]]+\ldots=a^\dagger+\frac{\alpha}{1!}=\alpha+a^\dagger
[/tex]

[tex]
e^{\alpha a}a e^{-\alpha a}=a+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,a]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,a]]+\ldots=a
[/tex]

In this sense the formula seems to be working fine.

Does it mean that the unitary transformation [itex] f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a} [/itex] represents a displacement of [itex]\alpha[/itex] in the second argument of [itex] f [/itex]?
 
  • #7
Yes, exactly. Under the transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex], you have [itex]a\to a[/itex] and [itex]a^{\dagger}\to a^{\dagger}+\alpha[/itex] and hence [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to f(a,a^{\dagger}+\alpha)[/itex]...nice and simple, no Taylor series needed:smile:
 
  • #8
gabbagabbahey said:
Yes, exactly. Under the transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex], you have [itex]a\to a[/itex] and [itex]a^{\dagger}\to a^{\dagger}+\alpha[/itex] and hence [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to f(a,a^{\dagger}+\alpha)[/itex]...nice and simple, no Taylor series needed:smile:

Thanks a lot, I think I finally understand it!
 

FAQ: Struggling with Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf-like formulas

What is the Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula?

The Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula is a mathematical formula used in the study of Lie groups and Lie algebras. It is used to calculate the product of two group elements in terms of their Lie algebra generators.

Why is it called the Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula?

The formula is named after the mathematicians Henry Frederick Baker, John Edward Campbell, and Fritz Haussdorf, who independently discovered and published it in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

What is the purpose of using the Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula?

The formula is used to simplify the computation of group products in Lie groups and Lie algebras. It allows for the calculation of group products in terms of the generators of the group, which makes it easier to work with in mathematical calculations.

How is the Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula derived?

The formula is derived using the theory of formal power series and the Campbell-Haussdorf theorem, which states that the group product can be expressed as an infinite series of commutators of the group generators.

Are there any limitations to the Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf formula?

While the formula is a powerful tool in the study of Lie groups and Lie algebras, it does have some limitations. It is only applicable to certain types of groups, such as finite-dimensional Lie groups. It also becomes increasingly complex as the number of group elements increases, making it difficult to use in practical applications.

Back
Top