Struggling with Statistical Sample Size Calculations?

  • Thread starter tedpark1212
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Work
In summary, for a two-sided t-test with a sample variance of σ² = 1.0, a population size of N = 350, and a desired power of 0.80, the required sample size for a level of significance of α = 0.05 is 525 and for a level of significance of α = 0.01 is 743.
  • #1
tedpark1212
14
0
Can anyone help me check my work for #4? I had trouble solving #4 but made an attempt. Please advise.

3. Suppose you want to show the significance of an effect size of 0.20 between your sample mean and a hypothesized mean. You intend to conduct a two-sided one-sample t-test. The sample variance is σ2 = 1.0. You assume that the population is large, or effectively infinite. If you want the test to have a power of 0.80, what is the required sample size for the following?

• A level of significance of α = 0.05

n = 2 σ2 (Z (beta) + Z (alpha/2)) 2/ effect size2
z(beta) = 1.28, z(alpha) = 1.96 for two-sided test at a level of significance of 0.05
n = 2(1) ( 1.28 + 1.96) 2/ 0.202------ for α = 0.05
n = 2 (20.9952) / 0.04
n=524.88
n= 525

The required sample size for a level of significance of α = 0.05 is 525.
• A level of significance of α = 0.01
n = 2 σ2 ( Z (beta) + Z (alpha/2) ) 2/ effect size2
z(beta) = 1.28, z(alpha) = 2.575 at a level of significance of 0.01
n = 2(1) ( 1.28 + 2.575) 2/ 0.202------ for α = 0.01
n= 2 (14.86) / 0.04
n=743.05
n= 743
The required sample size for a level of significance of α = 0.01 is 743.

4. After some research, you determine that the size of the population is N = 350. If you want the test to have a power of 0.80, what is the required sample size for the following?

A level of significance of α = 0.05
n = σ2 (Qe-1 + Qc-1 ) (Z(alpha) + Z(beta) 2 / μ₁²
n = 1(4) (1.645 + 1.282) 2 / (0.20)2
n = 856.7
n= 857
The required sample size for a level of significance of α = 0.05 is 857.
A level of significance of α = 0.01
n = σ2 (Qe-1 + Qc-1 ) (Z(alpha) + Z(beta) 2 / μ₁²
n = 1(4) (2.33 + 1.282) 2 / (0.20) 2
n= 1304.6
n= 1305
The required sample size for a level of significance of α = 0.01 is 1305.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello,

Thank you for sharing your work for #4. Overall, your calculations and approach seem correct. However, there are a few things I would like to point out for clarification.

First, for the calculation of the required sample size for a two-sided t-test, the formula you used is typically used for a one-sided test. For a two-sided test, the formula is n = (2 * σ² * (Z(α/2) + Z(β))²) / d², where d is the effect size. So for this problem, the formula would be n = (2 * 1 * (1.96 + 1.28)²) / 0.20² = 525. You also used the correct values for the z-scores (1.96 for a level of significance of α = 0.05, and 1.28 for a power of 0.80). Therefore, your final answer of 525 is correct for a level of significance of α = 0.05.

Second, for a level of significance of α = 0.01, the z-score for a two-sided test would be 2.575, not 2.33. So the correct calculation would be n = (2 * 1 * (2.575 + 1.28)²) / 0.20² = 743, which is the same answer you got.

Lastly, for the calculation of the required sample size for a two-sided test with a known population size, the formula you used is correct. However, the value for Qe-1 should be (N-n)/(N-1), where N is the population size and n is the sample size. So for this problem, it would be (350-1)/(350-1) = 0.997. Using this value, your final answers for both α = 0.05 and α = 0.01 are correct.

I hope this helps. Keep up the good work!
 

Related to Struggling with Statistical Sample Size Calculations?

What is the purpose of checking work for #4?

The purpose of checking work for #4 is to ensure accuracy and validity in the results. This is important in the scientific process as it helps to identify any errors or mistakes that may have been made and allows for corrections to be made before drawing conclusions or making any further decisions based on the results.

What are the steps involved in checking work for #4?

The steps involved in checking work for #4 may vary depending on the specific task or experiment being conducted. However, generally it involves reviewing the methods and procedures used, double-checking calculations and data entries, and comparing results to expected outcomes or previous data.

What are the potential consequences of not checking work for #4?

If work for #4 is not checked, there is a higher risk of errors or inaccuracies in the results. This can lead to incorrect conclusions being drawn and potentially impact the validity and reliability of the entire study or experiment. It can also waste time and resources if the work needs to be redone.

How can one ensure thoroughness in checking work for #4?

To ensure thoroughness in checking work for #4, it is important to follow a systematic approach and take the time to carefully review all aspects of the work. It can also be helpful to have a colleague or peer review the work as well, as a fresh set of eyes may catch any mistakes that were missed.

What are some common mistakes or areas of concern when checking work for #4?

Common mistakes when checking work for #4 include transcription errors, incorrect units or conversions, and overlooking small details. It is also important to be aware of potential biases or assumptions that may have influenced the results. Additionally, it is important to ensure that all steps and procedures were followed accurately.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top