- #1
omyojj
- 37
- 0
Hello,
As I know, the "standard" Sturm-Liouville problem
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}p\frac{d}{dx}y + \lambda\rho y = 0[/tex]
with boundary conditions
[tex]\begin{align}y^{\prime}(a)&=0 \\
y^{\prime}(b)&=F(\lambda)\end{align}[/tex]
has sequence of eigenvalues
[tex]\lambda < \lambda_1 < \lambda_2 < ... ...[/tex]
with corresponding eigenfunctions [itex]y_0, y_1, ... [/itex]
The "Standard" (sorry I'm not a math guy) Sturm's oscillation theorem states that
[itex]y_n[/itex] has exactly n zeros in (a,b).
(In some cases, there is a skip in the counting of the zeros of the eigenfunction compared to the index of the eigenvalue, n-1, or n-2 ... depending on the form of [itex]F(\lambda)[/itex]. (reference: Sturm-Liouville theory: past and present page. 20)
I solved the equation numerically and examined the number of zeros in [itex]y_n[/itex].
I find that for [itex]\lambda_0[/itex], [itex]y_0[/itex] has no zeros in the interval.
But for overtones, I find
# of zeros in y_n = (n+1)/2 for odd n = 1, 3, 5, ...
# of zeros in y_n = n/2 for even n = 2, 4, 6, ...
that is to say, eigenfunctions [itex]y_1, y_2[/itex] with distinct eigenvalues [itex]\lambda_1, \lambda_2[/itex]
have the same number of zeros (only one).
I'm trying to figure out why this is so.
Is there any theorem with regard to this?
As I know, the "standard" Sturm-Liouville problem
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}p\frac{d}{dx}y + \lambda\rho y = 0[/tex]
with boundary conditions
[tex]\begin{align}y^{\prime}(a)&=0 \\
y^{\prime}(b)&=F(\lambda)\end{align}[/tex]
has sequence of eigenvalues
[tex]\lambda < \lambda_1 < \lambda_2 < ... ...[/tex]
with corresponding eigenfunctions [itex]y_0, y_1, ... [/itex]
The "Standard" (sorry I'm not a math guy) Sturm's oscillation theorem states that
[itex]y_n[/itex] has exactly n zeros in (a,b).
(In some cases, there is a skip in the counting of the zeros of the eigenfunction compared to the index of the eigenvalue, n-1, or n-2 ... depending on the form of [itex]F(\lambda)[/itex]. (reference: Sturm-Liouville theory: past and present page. 20)
I solved the equation numerically and examined the number of zeros in [itex]y_n[/itex].
I find that for [itex]\lambda_0[/itex], [itex]y_0[/itex] has no zeros in the interval.
But for overtones, I find
# of zeros in y_n = (n+1)/2 for odd n = 1, 3, 5, ...
# of zeros in y_n = n/2 for even n = 2, 4, 6, ...
that is to say, eigenfunctions [itex]y_1, y_2[/itex] with distinct eigenvalues [itex]\lambda_1, \lambda_2[/itex]
have the same number of zeros (only one).
I'm trying to figure out why this is so.
Is there any theorem with regard to this?
Last edited: