SU(2) axial and vector subgroups

In summary, the conversation discusses how the group SU(2) can be split into its axial and vector subgroups in the context of the U(2)_L x U(2)_R global flavour symmetry of chiral Lagrangian. The axial generators of this group are the ones that are broken in QCD, giving rise to the three pions. The relationship between the usual definition of vectors and pseudovectors is explained through the presence of \gamma_{5} in the transformation law. The conversation also touches upon the meaning of chiral symmetry and how it can be independently realized on the two subspaces projected out by the P^{\pm} operators. The addition and subtraction of generators in the group is explained in terms of
  • #1
LAHLH
409
1
Hi,

Could someone explain to me how to split SU(2) into its axial and vector subgroups, what does this mean?

(The context I'm trying to understand this in is the U(2)_L x U(2)_R global flavour sym of chiral Lagrangian)

A related question: I know that the three axial generators of SU(2)_L x SU(2)_R get broken, and this leads to the three (pesudo)-goldstone bosons; the three pions. But why are there three axial generators of this group?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The group SU(2)_L x SU(2)_R has 6 generators [itex]T^a_L, T^a_R[/itex] (a=1,2,3).

We can also use generators [itex]T^a_L + T^a_R[/itex] and [itex]T^a_L - T^a_R[/itex]. The first one generates SU(2)_V and the second one generates SU(2)_A. So you can think of vector and axial symmetries as a change of basis of SU(2)^2.

The axial generators are the broken ones in QCD, giving rise to the 3 pions.

Note that your question as phrased: "how to split SU(2) into its axial and vector subgroups?" makes no sense, as a SINGLE SU(2) doesn't have such a decomposition.
 
  • #3
Hi Blechman,

Could you tell me why with addition of these generators the group is "vectorial" and "axial" with subtraction ?

Thanks
 
  • #4
"Vector" means L and R fermions transform the same way:

[tex]\psi_L\longrightarrow e^{i\alpha^aT_L^a}\psi_L,\qquad\psi_
R\longrightarrow e^{i\alpha^aT_R^a}\psi_R[/tex]

Hence + sign.

"Axial" means L and R fermions transform oppositely:

[tex]\psi_L\longrightarrow e^{i\alpha^aT_L^a}\psi_L,\qquad\psi_
R\longrightarrow e^{-i\alpha^aT_R^a}\psi_R[/tex]Hence - sign.
 
  • #5
thanks
I accept your answer but what is the relationship with the usual definition of vectors and pseudovectors.
I'm sorry if this is obvious.
 
  • #6
The word “Axial” indicates the presence of [itex]\gamma_{5}[/itex] in the transformation law.
Consider the following axial transformation of a fermion field with TWO FLAVOURS;
[tex]\Psi \rightarrow U_{5}\Psi \equiv \exp (i \frac{\epsilon . \tau}{2}\gamma_{5}) \Psi . \ \ (1)[/tex]
In this, [itex]\gamma_{5}[/itex] operates on the Dirac components of [itex]\Psi[/itex], while Pauli’s matrices [itex]\tau^{i}[/itex] operate on the internal 2-dimensional flavour space of the fermions. We may call this group [itex]SU(2)_{5}[/itex]. This transformation takes on a simple form when expressed in terms of the chiral components of [itex]\Psi[/itex]. That is
[tex]
\Psi_{R}\rightarrow V \Psi_{R} \equiv \exp( i \frac{\epsilon . \tau}{2}) \Psi_{R},
[/tex]
[tex]
\Psi_{L}\rightarrow V^{\dagger}\Psi_{L} \equiv \exp( - i \frac{\epsilon . \tau}{2}) \Psi_{L}.
[/tex]
This can be shown by expanding eq(1) in a power series, and using the following
[tex]\Psi = \Psi_{R} + \Psi_{L},[/tex]
[tex]\gamma_{5}\Psi = \Psi_{R} - \Psi_{L}.[/tex]
So, the [itex]8 \times 8[/itex] transformation matrix [itex]U_{5}[/itex] can be written as
[tex]U_{5} = VP^{+} + V^{\dagger}P^{-}\ \ \ (2),[/tex]
where
[tex]P^{\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(1 \pm \gamma_{5}),[/tex]
are projection operators.
From eq(2), it follows that
[tex]\gamma^{\mu}U_{5}= U^{\dagger}_{5}\gamma^{\mu}.[/tex]
This means that [itex]\Psi[/itex] and [itex]\bar{\Psi}[/itex] transform in the same way,
[tex]\Psi \rightarrow U_{5}\Psi,[/tex]
[tex]\bar{\Psi}\rightarrow \bar{\Psi}U_{5}.[/tex]
Thus, chirally invariant Lagrangian must be constructed out of massless fermions; the presence of a small fermion mass term provides a mechanism for breaking chiral symmetry.
Since our fermion field has two flavours, the theory must also be invariant under the global group [itex]SU(2)[/itex]. So, the total symmetry group is [itex]SU(2) \times SU(2)_{5}[/itex]. This group is equivalent to [itex]SU(2)_{L}\times SU(2)_{R}[/itex] with element
[tex]
U_{L}U_{R}= \exp(i\frac{\epsilon_{L}.\tau}{2}P^{-}) \exp( i \frac{\epsilon_{R}.\tau}{2}P^{+}),
[/tex]
where [itex]\epsilon_{L}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{R}[/itex] are the independent parameters. To see the equivalence, let [itex]\Psi_{L}= P^{-}\Psi[/itex], and [itex]\Psi_{R}= P^{+}\Psi[/itex] be associated with the (finite dimensional) irreducible representations of Lorentz group [itex](1/2,0) \oplus (1/2,0)[/itex] and [itex](0,1/2) \oplus (0,1/2)[/itex], respectively. The transformations under two commuting [itex]SU(2)[/itex] groups are
[tex](2,1) \in SU(2)_{L}:[/tex]
[tex]\Psi_{L}\rightarrow U_{L}\Psi_{L}\equiv \exp( i\frac{\epsilon_{L}.\tau}{2})\Psi_{L},[/tex]
[tex]\Psi_{R}\rightarrow \Psi_{R},[/tex]
which can be combined into
[tex]
\Psi \rightarrow e^{i\frac{\epsilon_{L}.\tau}{2}} \frac{1}{2}(1 - \gamma_{5})\Psi + \frac{1}{2}(1 + \gamma_{5})\Psi,
[/tex]
or
[tex]\Psi \rightarrow \exp(i\frac{\epsilon_{L}.\tau}{2}P_{-})\Psi .[/tex]

[tex](1,2) \in SU(2)_{R}:[/tex]

[tex]\Psi_{L}\rightarrow \Psi_{L},[/tex]
[tex]\Psi_{R}\rightarrow U_{R}\Psi_{R} = \exp( i\frac{\epsilon_{R}.\tau}{2})\Psi_{R},[/tex]
which we can write as
[tex]\Psi \rightarrow \exp(i\frac{\epsilon_{R}.\tau}{2}P^{+})\Psi[/tex]
Therefore, the combined [itex]SU(2)_{L}\times SU(2)_{R}[/itex] transformation is given by
[tex]
\Psi \rightarrow U_{L}U_{R}\Psi = \exp[i(\epsilon_{L}P^{-} + \epsilon_{R}P^{+}) . \frac{\tau}{2}] \Psi . \ \ \ (3)
[/tex]
If we define
[tex]\alpha = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{R} + \epsilon_{L}),[/tex]
[tex]\epsilon = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{R} - \epsilon_{L}),[/tex]
then, the [itex]SU(2)_{L}\times SU(2)_{R}[/itex] element [itex]U_{L}U_{R}[/itex] becomes
[tex]
U_{L}U_{R} = \exp(i\frac{\alpha . \tau}{2}) \exp(i\frac{\epsilon . \tau}{2}\gamma_{5}),
[/tex]
which belongs to the original symmetry group [itex]SU(2) \times SU(2)_{5}[/itex].
The meaning of chiral symmetry is, according to eq(3), the statement that an [itex]SU(2)[/itex] symmetry can be INDEPENDENTLY realized on the two subspaces projected out by the [itex]P^{\pm}[/itex] operators, i.e., the transformations on these two spaces can have different parameters.

Regards
Sam
 
Last edited:
  • #7
naima said:
Could you tell me why with addition of these generators the group is "vectorial" and "axial" with subtraction ?

Thanks

In the essence it's simple: The two chiral components [itex]\psi_L[/itex] and [itex]\psi_R[/itex]
have some similarities with left and right circular polarized photons.
Independently they propagate at the speed of light, however if you
couple them together then the combined momentum is the sum of
the two individual momenta and the resulting propagation speed of
the particle can be anywhere between +c and -c.

For the combined momentum one first calculates the individual momenta.

[itex]\psi_L\tilde{\sigma}^\mu\psi_L[/itex] and [itex]\psi_R\sigma^\mu\psi_R[/itex]

The sum of these two is the combined momentum, a vector.
However [itex]\psi_L\tilde{\sigma}^\mu\psi_L[/itex] is also a measure for left handedness while
[itex]\psi_R\sigma^\mu\psi_R[/itex] is a measure for right handedness.

This means that when you subtract the two you get their combined
"handedness", which is an axial vector.Regards, Hans
 
  • #8
Thank you very much for your answers.
It just remains for me to make a synthesis of these aspects!
 
  • #9
Citation from Weinberg´s second Volume on Quantum Field Theory Page 184 (botton of the page):

"It is not true that an unbroken chiral
symmetry necessarily implies a zero nucleon mass, unless we make further assumptions
about the matrix elements of the axial-vector current ."

A good and lucid treatment on chiral spontaneous symmetry breaking can be found in my opinion in Chapter 9 of "Stefan Pokorski-Gauge Field Theories".
 
  • #10
I have another question that maybe fits here:

In a hadron physics lecture some ratios of hadron masses where given to proof that SU(2)_V is conserved, while SU(2)_A is spontaneously broken, e.g.

[tex] SU(2)_V \hspace{20mm} \frac{m_{\pi^+} - m_{\pi^-}}{m_{\pi^+} + m_{\pi^-}} = 0.1\% [/tex]
[tex] SU(3)_V \hspace{20mm} \frac{m_{f_0} - m_{\pi}}{m_{f_0} + m_{\pi}} = 56\% [/tex]

While the first one kind of makes sense to me the second does not.

How does the vector and axial charge act on hadrons?

Thanks!
 

FAQ: SU(2) axial and vector subgroups

What is the difference between SU(2) axial and vector subgroups?

The SU(2) group is a special unitary group that consists of 2x2 complex matrices with unit determinant. The axial and vector subgroups are two distinct subgroups of SU(2). The axial subgroup consists of matrices with determinant -1, while the vector subgroup consists of matrices with determinant +1. This difference in determinant leads to different properties and behaviors of the subgroups.

How are the axial and vector subgroups related to each other?

The axial and vector subgroups are related through the SU(2) group. The axial subgroup is a normal subgroup of SU(2), meaning it is preserved under conjugation by any matrix in SU(2). This allows for a one-to-one correspondence between the elements of the axial subgroup and cosets of the vector subgroup, which are the different ways the vector subgroup can be transformed by the axial subgroup.

What is the significance of the axial and vector subgroups in physics?

In physics, the axial and vector subgroups are important in the study of symmetries and conservation laws. They are related to the concept of parity, which describes the transformation of a system under spatial inversion. The axial subgroup is associated with parity-odd interactions, while the vector subgroup is associated with parity-even interactions. This distinction is crucial in understanding the fundamental forces in the universe.

Can the axial and vector subgroups be broken?

Yes, the axial and vector subgroups can be broken. In the context of particle physics, the breaking of the axial subgroup is known as chiral symmetry breaking, and plays a role in the generation of mass for certain particles. The breaking of the vector subgroup is known as electroweak symmetry breaking, which gives rise to the weak force and explains the existence of massive particles.

How are the axial and vector subgroups related to the concept of isospin?

The concept of isospin is closely related to SU(2) symmetry. Isospin is a quantum number that describes the symmetry between different types of particles, such as protons and neutrons. The axial and vector subgroups of SU(2) correspond to different types of isospin transformations. The axial subgroup is associated with isospin rotations, while the vector subgroup is associated with isospin flips. This allows for the classification and study of particles based on their isospin properties.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top