##SU(2)## doublets, Majorana Fermions and Higgs

In summary, the conversation discusses the properties of various fermion pairs, including doublets and neutral Majorana fermions, that couple to the Higgs via Yukawa coupling. The difference between ##L## and ##L^{c}## is that the latter is the complex conjugate of the former. The superscript ##c## signifies charge conjugation. The term ##LL^{c}## breaks ##SU(2)## gauge invariance, while the term ##\bar{L}L^{c}## is not a hypercharge singlet due to the same hypercharge of ##\bar{L}## and ##L^{c}##. The Lagrangian in the article is not Lorentz invariant without
  • #1
spaghetti3451
1,344
34
Say ##L## and ##L^{c}## are a pair of ##SU(2)## doublets (electroweak-charge fermions) and ##N_{1}## and ##N_{1}^{c}## are a pair of neutral Majorana fermions.

Say that these fermions couple to the Higgs via Yukawa coupling and have vector masses ##M_0## and ##M_1## respectively:

$$M_{0}LL^{c} + M_{1}N_{1}N_{1}^{c} + YHLN_{1}^{c} + Y^{c}H^{\dagger}L^{c}N_{1}$$What is the difference between ##L## and ##L^{c}##?

What does the superscript ##c## signify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Charge conjugation. Your ##LL^c## term breaks SU(2) gauge invariance.
 
  • #3
How does the ##LL^{c}## term break ##SU(2)## gauge invariance?
 
  • #4
I really meant to say SU(2)xU(1). You are missing a number of bars on your fermion fields. The term ##\bar L L^c## is not a hypercharge singlet because ##\bar L## and ##L^c## have the same hypercharge.
 
  • #5
Orodruin said:
I really meant to say SU(2)xU(1). You are missing a number of bars on your fermion fields. The term ##\bar L L^c## is not a hypercharge singlet because ##\bar L## and ##L^c## have the same hypercharge.

But, ##L## is the complex conjugate of ##L^{c}##. So, isn't ##LL^{c}## a scalar?

Why then do we need to have ##\bar{L}L^{c}##?
 
  • #6
Without the bar your expression is not Lorentz invariant.
 
  • #7
The Lagrangian is taken from equation (1.1) in page 2 of the article in the link https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06320.

In the article, there is no bar on ##L##. What am I getting wrong here?
 
  • #8
They are being sloppy. Any specialist reading that is going to understand what they mean.
 
  • #9
Okay, in the Dirac Lagrangian, it is possible to have the mass term ##m\bar{\psi}\psi##.

So, why can't we have the term ##M_{0}\bar{L}L## and not ##M_{0}\bar{L}L^{c}## here?
 
  • #10
The first one because you cannot have a mass term involving two left-handed fields. The second because it violates gauge invariance.
 
  • #11
So, let me get this right:

the correct term is ##M_{0}LL^{c}## and not ##M_{0}\bar{L}L^{c}##?
 
  • #12
Also, why is ##M_0## called the vector mass and not simply the mass?
 

FAQ: ##SU(2)## doublets, Majorana Fermions and Higgs

What is an SU(2) doublet?

An SU(2) doublet is a fundamental representation of the special unitary group SU(2). It is a mathematical object that describes the behavior of particles with spin 1/2, such as the electron or quark.

What are Majorana fermions?

Majorana fermions are particles that are their own antiparticles. This means that they have the same mass and properties as their corresponding antiparticle. They were first proposed by Italian physicist Ettore Majorana in the 1930s.

What is the role of Higgs in particle physics?

The Higgs field is a fundamental field that is responsible for giving particles their mass. The Higgs mechanism, proposed by British physicist Peter Higgs in the 1960s, explains why some particles have mass while others do not.

How are SU(2) doublets and Higgs related?

In the Standard Model of particle physics, the Higgs field is a SU(2) doublet. This means that it transforms in a specific way under SU(2) transformations. The Higgs field also gives mass to the SU(2) doublet particles, such as the W and Z bosons.

Are there any experimental evidence for the existence of Majorana fermions?

There is currently no direct experimental evidence for the existence of Majorana fermions. However, there are ongoing experiments looking for their signatures, such as the search for neutrinoless double beta decay, which would provide indirect evidence for their existence.

Similar threads

Back
Top