Submarine communications and RF skin depth

In summary, submarine communications rely on electromagnetic waves, particularly radio frequency (RF) signals, to transmit information underwater. The concept of RF skin depth is crucial, as it describes how deeply RF signals can penetrate into a conductive medium, such as seawater. The skin depth varies with frequency and the conductivity of the water, affecting the range and efficacy of communication systems. Understanding these principles is essential for optimizing submarine communication technologies and overcoming challenges posed by underwater environments.
  • #1
Guineafowl
791
383
TL;DR Summary
How does visible light penetrate seawater, when even a 1 MHz signal struggles? The question comes from studying how submarines communicate.
In conductive media like seawater, EM waves experience attenuation related to their frequency. The skin depth formula calculates the depth at which ##e^{-1}## attenuation is reached. The skin depth is inversely proportional to frequency.

In practical terms, only extremely low frequencies (eg 80 Hz) are able to penetrate significant distances, and the range of even a 1 MHz signal would be a metre or two.

So how is it that blue light, an EM wave around ##10^{14}## Hz is feasible for submarine comms, or to put it another way, given the above, why am I able to see things when swimming in the sea?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Generally, when submarines want to communicate , they want to communicate with something miles away - and they do it by sticking something above the water (an antenna on their sail or a tethered buoy) and using radio communications.

A discussion of how water absorbs EM is available in wikipedia.

You (@Guineafowl ) have not cited your source for the equations you are using. But I believe that if you check that source, they only deal with the electrical conductivity of the liquid and apply only to radio frequencies that are not assisted by the actual chemistry of the liquid.
 
  • #3
Apparently, fresh water RF comms are feasible, eg:
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/194214/7/194214.pdf

Regarding seawater, an example formula is here (page 317):
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...dubG9hZCIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6Il9kaXJlY3QifX0

$$\partial = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\mu_0 \sigma \omega}}$$
Where:
##\partial## = skin depth
##\mu_0## = permeability of free space
##\sigma## = conductivity
##\omega## = angular frequency

Some examples are given by this RF engineer in a very interesting video:


Reproduced here.
Frequency:Skin depth in seawater (m):
1 GHz0.015
1 MHz0.280
1 kHz8.800
1 Hz280.0

With that trend, a ##10^{14}## Hz blue light wave should have no chance, so there’s something I’m missing. If I’ve read your last sentence correctly, @.Scott , are you saying that at visible light frequencies, a different effect comes into play that overcomes the attenuation?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Guineafowl said:
With that trend, a ##10^{14}## Hz blue light wave should have no chance, so there’s something I’m missing. If I’ve read your last sentence correctly, @.Scott , are you saying that at visible light frequencies, a different effect comes into play that overcomes the attenuation?
The EM absorption of water varies strongly with frequency. There is a passband at visible frequencies (which is no doubt why animals, including humans, evolved eyes to detect this band). From J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed.:

Jackson.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Guineafowl and DaveE
  • #5
80 Hz can be used to call a submarine, to listen at higher frequencies from closer to the surface.

Space and airborne radar is used to measure the thickness of sea ice and icecaps. Ice is more resistive than seawater, and has a low Er = 3.15 compared to liquid water, Er = 80. That can make icebergs difficult to see with radar.

Where a submarine rests on the bottom, near a port on a river, fresh water flows out over the salt water. The submarine can rise to be at a stable neutral buoyancy, in the salt-fresh water boundary, then communicate through the fresh water.
 
  • #6
Guineafowl said:
The skin depth is inversely proportional to frequency.
Only in simple conductors with constant resistivity.

Guineafowl said:
In practical terms, only extremely low frequencies (eg 80 Hz) are able to penetrate significant distances, and the range of even a 1 MHz signal would be a metre or two.
Which is soooo far away from blue light as to be irrelevant.

Don't confuse what you read in an EM textbook with chemistry. Metals are special because of the (relatively) free conduction band electrons; that's not like sea water.

The term spectroscopy comes to mind...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #7
renormalize said:
The EM absorption of water varies strongly with with frequency. There is a passband at visible frequencies (which is no doubt why animals, including humans, evolved eyes to detect this band). From J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed.:

View attachment 343405
This seems to explain it - thanks. Another example of how the fascinating behaviour of water has enabled and shaped life.
 

FAQ: Submarine communications and RF skin depth

What is submarine communications?

Submarine communications refer to the methods and technologies used to transmit information underwater, primarily between submarines and shore stations or between submarines themselves. This includes the use of various communication systems such as acoustic, optical, and radio frequency (RF) systems, with each having its own advantages and limitations based on the underwater environment.

How does RF skin depth affect submarine communications?

RF skin depth is the measure of how deeply RF signals can penetrate a conductive medium, such as seawater. In submarine communications, the skin depth determines the effectiveness of RF signals in transmitting information underwater. Since seawater is a conductive medium, RF signals can only penetrate to a limited depth, which restricts the range and reliability of RF communications in underwater environments.

What are the typical frequencies used for submarine communications?

Submarine communications often utilize low-frequency RF bands, typically ranging from 3 kHz to 30 kHz, as these frequencies can penetrate seawater more effectively than higher frequencies. Acoustic communications, which are also commonly used, operate in the kilohertz range and can provide broader coverage, especially for long-range communications.

What are the advantages of using acoustic communications over RF in submarines?

Acoustic communications have several advantages over RF communications in underwater environments. They can penetrate seawater much more effectively, allowing for longer ranges and better reliability. Additionally, acoustic systems are less affected by the salinity and temperature variations of seawater, making them more suitable for various underwater conditions. However, they typically have lower data transfer rates compared to RF systems.

What challenges do submarines face in maintaining communication underwater?

Submarines face several challenges in maintaining communication underwater, including signal attenuation due to seawater conductivity, interference from background noise, and the limited range of RF and acoustic systems. Additionally, submarines must operate stealthily, which can further complicate communication efforts. Ensuring secure and reliable communication while minimizing detection by adversaries remains a critical challenge for submarine operations.

Back
Top