- #1
anJos
- 1
- 0
Hello! Let's see if you can give me some advice on this:
I want to describe a function with a sum of real exponentials
[tex]F(t)=\sum a(n) \cdot exp(-k(n) \cdot t)[/tex]
Now, I don't have to calculate the coefficents (an or kn). The only thing I have to do is to make sure that F(t) is a function that can be rewritten like this. How do I know this?
I found something called "Bernstein's theorem" which stated that a function which is totally monotone is a mixture of exponentials. I checked the definition and some of the functions I'm struggling with does not fulfill this. Yet, it seems like these functions can still be described as a sum of exponentials (I used fminsearch in Matlab to check it).
Is it enough if F(t) is strictly decreasing?
For example, I have the following function:
[tex]F(t)=(1-at)({2 \over 3}+{1 \over 3}cos(2 \pi at))+{1 \over 2 \pi}sin(2 \pi at)[/tex]
... and want to show that it can be rewritten as a sum of exponentials.
I want to describe a function with a sum of real exponentials
[tex]F(t)=\sum a(n) \cdot exp(-k(n) \cdot t)[/tex]
Now, I don't have to calculate the coefficents (an or kn). The only thing I have to do is to make sure that F(t) is a function that can be rewritten like this. How do I know this?
I found something called "Bernstein's theorem" which stated that a function which is totally monotone is a mixture of exponentials. I checked the definition and some of the functions I'm struggling with does not fulfill this. Yet, it seems like these functions can still be described as a sum of exponentials (I used fminsearch in Matlab to check it).
Is it enough if F(t) is strictly decreasing?
For example, I have the following function:
[tex]F(t)=(1-at)({2 \over 3}+{1 \over 3}cos(2 \pi at))+{1 \over 2 \pi}sin(2 \pi at)[/tex]
... and want to show that it can be rewritten as a sum of exponentials.