Summations Homework: Is Rewrite Correct?

  • Thread starter Niles
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Homework
In summary, the writer is trying to find the delta function for a sum, but at this point, they don't know where to start. They could simplify by eliminating one of the variables, but ultimately, they would get a conservation of momentum.
  • #1
Niles
1,866
0
Hi guys

Is the following way of rewriting the sum correct?

[tex]
\sum\limits_{k,k',k'',k'''} {c_k^\dag c_{k'}^{} c_{k''}^\dag c_{k'''}^{} \sum\limits_n {e^{ - ir_n \left( {k - k'} \right)} e^{ - ir_n \left( {k'' - k'''} \right)} } } = \sum\limits_{k,k',k'',k'''} {c_{k + q}^\dag c_{k'}^{} c_{k'' - q}^\dag c_{k'''}^{} \sum\limits_n {e^{ - ir_n \left( {k - k'} \right)} e^{ - ir_n \left( {k'' - k'''} \right)} } }
[/tex]

If yes, then the next step in my calculation is to use that the last sum on the RHS is a delta-function in k,k' and k'',k'''.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Off hand I don't see it. Where did q come from and how do you justify the index shifts?
(I'm looking at in purely mathematical terms - you should give the ranges for the indices - it would clarify the analysis).
 
  • #3


The sum on the right hand side can only be a single delta-function. You should get a delta function in k-k'+k''-k''', which will eliminate one k variable.
 
  • #4


Thanks guys. Ok, so looking at the LHS, then I have the condition that k''' = k-k'+k'', and the k''' can be removed. What would be the next step from here (I assume some change in indices, but I cannot quite see which one)?

I think we can disregard what I wrote in the OP. It doesn't seem correct.
 
Last edited:
  • #5


Well you could do something like q = k'' - k'. But since indices are summed over, they are just dummy indices so there is no real advantage to do this. What is your goal with manipulating this quantity?
 
  • #6


My goal is merely to simplify. I have Fourier Transformed from real-space. If I define q = k'' - k', then do I have the two k'', k' sums into one q-sum?
 
  • #7


I don't really see why you needed to go to the right hand side of the equation in the first place... You could have gotten that delta function right from the start.

And all you get eventually is a conservation of momentum: k-k'+k''-k'''=0 .
There is no further simplification... so I would write:
[tex] N \sum c_k _1 ^\dag c _k _2 c_k _3 ^\dag c _k _4 \delta _{k1-k2+k3-k4,0} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #8


Yeah, then you would have sum over k',k'' and q. You might get something with nice looking indices like [tex]c_{k'}^\dagger c_{k'+q} c_{k''}^\dagger c_{k''-q}[/tex] but I think that's about as far as you could go.
 

FAQ: Summations Homework: Is Rewrite Correct?

What is a summation?

A summation is a mathematical notation that represents the addition of a sequence of numbers. It is typically denoted by the Greek letter sigma (∑) followed by the expression to be summed.

How do I know if my summation is correct?

To check if your summation is correct, you can use mathematical formulas and properties to simplify the expression and verify that it is equivalent to the original sum. You can also plug in a few values for the variables to see if the result matches your expected outcome.

What is the purpose of rewriting a summation?

The purpose of rewriting a summation is to simplify the expression and make it easier to evaluate. This can be done by using known mathematical identities, properties, or techniques such as factoring or rearranging terms.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when rewriting a summation?

Some common mistakes to avoid when rewriting a summation include incorrectly applying mathematical properties or using incorrect notation. It is also important to be careful when simplifying complex expressions and double-check your work to ensure accuracy.

Can I use different notation when rewriting a summation?

Yes, there are different notations that can be used when rewriting a summation. Some common alternatives include using a product symbol (∏) for multiplication instead of sigma (∑) for addition, or using ellipses (...) to represent a sequence of terms. However, it is important to clearly define any alternative notation used to avoid confusion.

Similar threads

Back
Top