Surface plasmon polaritons at metal / insulator interfaces

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem related to surface plasmon polaritons at a metal-vacuum interface. Participants are exploring the relationship between the electric field (E) and the scalar potential, emphasizing the need to verify boundary conditions for tangential and normal components of the electric field and displacement field (D). The problem involves checking continuity conditions at the interface and using the dielectric function of the metal to analyze optically-active oscillations. Despite extensive attempts, the original poster has struggled to find a solution after eight hours of work. The conversation aims to clarify these concepts and assist in solving the problem effectively.
Monster1771
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the metal-vacuum interface located at z = 0,the metal filling the entire half-space z ≥ 0, vacuum filling (!?) the half-space z < 0. The dielectric function in the metal in the long-wavelength limit is given by:
fd7a516016b09d30cdfca8d7c47caf37627.png

where ε0 is the vacuum permittivity. In the metal a solution of Laplace’s equation ∇2φ = 0 is
29a96a81799c97e4145b6ee2d4a179db105.png

8b51affd50a3b66259d31e5d9bdf6c72888.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried to solve this problem for 8 hours, still no result. Maybe some of you might help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) How are E and the scalar potential related? Note: the tangential derivative in this case is simply ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}##, and the normal derivative is ##\frac{\partial}{\partial z}##. Check to see if the solutions provided satisfy the boundary condition that the tangential component of the electric field is continuous at the interface (z=0).

b) Similar to (a), but now you check the normal direction and use the macroscopic formalism (D as opposed to E). The problem tells you that the normal component of D will be continuous (means 0 free charge at the interface). Use the given formula for the dielectric function of the metal and solve for ##\omega##. What can you conclude about the optically-active oscillations at the interface?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K