Surviving the Aquarium: A Reality Check on Action Scenes

  • Thread starter DHF
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Reality
In summary, the tank is not embedded in the wall but rather sitting in a cavity in the wall and is not anchored to it so that when the hostile party is thrown into it, it might be displaced.
  • #1
DHF
247
32
Hey guys, my wife and I are writing a short story and I wanted to perform a reality check on the following scene and see what changes might be needed to make it possible.

In the scene we have written the main character has enhanced speed and strength and she gets attacked in her home, during the course of combat she tosses her assailant through an aquarium that is embedded in the wall. the way the scene is currently written the assailant goes through the tank and comes out on the other end, and survives the sequence. The tank is expossed on both ends of the wall and the thickness is negotiable.

Reading over the scene I can guess some things need to change. I am assuming that said assailant would not survive the trip considering the force needed to shove them through the tank. My question is: is it possible at all? Ie. if the tank were thinner or if the structure of the tank had been breached with gun fire, would they make it through and live to be questioned afterwards or would they wind up a bag of jelly no matter which way this went?

thanks in advance for any tips or corrections or "get the hell out of here that is crazy talk".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, give us the dimensions of the aquarium as you'd like it to be.
 
  • #3
Well initially I was thinking (60"L x 18"W x 40"H) however I am flexible as the dimensions of the tank arnt given in the scene save for the fact that it divided the wall between the dining room an kitchen. so I was more interested if the scene was technically possible at all.

The other option is that the tank is not embedded in the wall but rather sitting in a cavity in the wall but is not anchored to it so that when the hostile party is thrown into it, it might be displaced. my main concern was that all of these events require tremendous amounts of force an I wasn't sure if a human body, even one of a hardened soldier could survive.
 
  • #4
If he manages to hit hands-first then he'd be slowed down by the time he hits, and the sharp glass would be more likely to cut arms then head. (Do fish tanks use auto-style safety glass?)

You might also have him hit the wall under the tank, and have the tank fall down on him. Or the reverse - he hits right at the top of the tank, pushing the outer glass wall in, and breaking it below his actual contact point.

If the wall is strong enough to support the tank, then it must have support beams that would be 18 - 24 inches apart. That would cause more damage then the tank.
 
  • #5
If you make the aquarium out of tempered glass(and yes a lot are made that way) then your bad guy who maybe has a ring(s) on his hand(s) or maybe a knife in his hands then that small hard metal impacting at high sped will shatter the glass but it will explode into a huge amount of non-jagged round or cube shapes. Another thing is the bad guy could have a gun and hit it with that huge force from your super strong guy. That way you could decide how much he was injured by how badly do you want this guy hurt for the story? Is he a main antagonist type? If so I would suggest using the explosion of the glass to make his escape. He could be blinded in one or both eyes. He could be cut some,especially on the face, which might make the bad guy even more angry because he has been disfigured. Realistically you can give him as many or as few injuries as you want and retain story reality and integrity.

If you are interested in more help on things I am happy to help. I do have experience in the publishing world as an author.It sounds like doing a little collaborating(if and only if you want to) I would be most happy and willing to help.


The Logician
 
  • #6
I'd like to have another question, I didnt want to open another topic for that, the title seemed good.

While according to TV trope, the test failed, that you could incapacitate someone with a stun gun, as it was in the Stallone movie, simply pushing it into water, however, does it sound realistic, that you throw a wet towel to the stun gun, so the attacker zaps his own hand?
 
  • #7
perhaps the glass could be cracked earlier in the fight scene and a lot of the water could spill out making the floor slippery during the fight putting the girl speed and strength to her disadvantage. If the tank is destroyed in the scene anyway why not set up a plausible explanation for how the attacker goes through it early to save time explaining it later. Also if he is attacking super strong people knowingly one would assume he would wear some form of body armor and head protection. As for the wall? Going through the wall as well might be pushing it.

I know you wanted science and I'm not a scientist but I hope this helps.

The wet towel makes sense to me though. From what I know you get burns where the electricity goes in and where it comes out. The wet towel so long as it is dripping wet should conduct the electricity to the mans flesh and as long as he is grounded he should know about it. The electrocution would cause his muscles to contract and grip tighter to the taser as well, thereby closing a loop on cause and effect that is inescapable.
 
  • #8
Thanks guys. This helps. so with this information it looks like there might be a gun struggle and one of the shots would puncture the tank, then the badguy will go through the damaged tank wall and come out wet and scratched up and make their fair escape.

@Luka : The attacker was actually unaware of the Girl's abilities and is caught by complete surprise.
 
  • #9
DHF said:
Thanks guys. This helps. so with this information it looks like there might be a gun struggle and one of the shots would puncture the tank, then the badguy will go through the damaged tank wall and come out wet and scratched up and make their fair escape.

@Luka : The attacker was actually unaware of the Girl's abilities and is caught by complete surprise.

Look forward to reading it when your writing team is finished. Action oriented scifi's my personal scifi of choice.
 
  • #10
Well book one is out so far if you want to read it. This scene come into play for a while. We are wrapping book two right now and at last disccusion there was talk about cutting the scene and putting it in a separate book.

But if you want to read about the characters and story check it out:
www.warriorsofluna.com

The book is available on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0991108892/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
DHF said:
...
so with this information it looks like there might be a gun struggle and one of the shots would puncture the tank, then the badguy will go through the damaged tank wall and come out wet and scratched up and make their fair escape.
If a bullet went through the tank, wouldn't the safety glass immediately crumble into thousands of pieces and all the water would drain out? The bad guy is knocked through the opening into the other room and makes his escape, eh?
 
  • #12
That looks like the only way I can make it work. I haven't come up with any figures but I imagine being pushed through a tank of water like that would be like getting shoved through a cement wall. there is no way the bad guy would be alive, much less conscious and running away.
 

FAQ: Surviving the Aquarium: A Reality Check on Action Scenes

What is a "Reality Check" on an action scene?

A "Reality Check" on an action scene refers to the process of evaluating the realism and believability of a particular action sequence in a movie or TV show. It involves analyzing the physical laws and limitations, as well as the human capabilities, involved in the scene to determine if it is plausible or not.

Why is a "Reality Check" important for action scenes?

A "Reality Check" is important for action scenes because it helps to create a sense of realism and immersion for the audience. If the action is too far-fetched or unrealistic, it can take away from the overall viewing experience and make the scene less impactful. It also ensures that the scene is safe and feasible for the actors and stunt performers involved.

Who conducts a "Reality Check" on action scenes?

A "Reality Check" on action scenes is typically conducted by a team of experts, including stunt coordinators, special effects technicians, and sometimes even scientists or engineers. They work together to evaluate the physical and technical aspects of the scene and make any necessary adjustments to ensure its realism and safety.

What are some common elements that are assessed during a "Reality Check" on action scenes?

Some common elements that are assessed during a "Reality Check" include the laws of physics, human anatomy and physiology, the capabilities of equipment and technology, and the potential risks and safety measures involved. Other factors may also be considered, such as the environment and weather conditions.

Can a perfectly realistic action scene ever be achieved?

While a "Reality Check" can help to make action scenes more believable and safer, it may not always be possible to achieve a completely realistic scene. Some level of exaggeration and creative license may be necessary for the sake of entertainment. However, the goal is to strike a balance between realism and spectacle to create a satisfying and immersive viewing experience for the audience.

Similar threads

3
Replies
96
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
266
Views
28K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top