System of congruences with no solution

  • MHB
  • Thread starter vincentvance
  • Start date
  • Tags
    System
In summary, the conversation discusses the process of proving that a system of equations has no solution. This is done by first assuming there is a solution and then using the concept of taking classes mod 6 to show that the second equation implies 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6). This means that x ≡ 2 (mod 3), which helps in understanding why x ≡ 5 (mod 6) and x ≡ 7 (mod 15) have no solution.
  • #1
vincentvance
9
0
Hello,

I am trying to prove that the system

x ≡ 5 (mod 6)
x ≡ 7 (mod 15)

has no solution. This example is done in my textbook and they say one should first assume that there is a solution x, and that when taking classes mod 6 the second equation implies that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6). After this the example continues and I can follow the remaining steps, but this particular part I don't understand. What does it mean to "take classes mod 6" and why does the second equation imply that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6)?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
vincentvance said:
Hello,

I am trying to prove that the system

x ≡ 5 (mod 6)
x ≡ 7 (mod 15)

has no solution. This example is done in my textbook and they say one should first assume that there is a solution x, and that when taking classes mod 6 the second equation implies that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6). After this the example continues and I can follow the remaining steps, but this particular part I don't understand. What does it mean to "take classes mod 6" and why does the second equation imply that 2x ≡ 2 (mod 6)?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
You might find it easiest to understand this by working mod 3, using the fact that 6 and 15 are both multiples of 3. In fact, if $x \equiv 5\pmod6$ then $x\equiv2\pmod3$. But if $x\equiv7\pmod{15}$ then $x\equiv1\pmod3.$
 
  • #3
Opalg said:
You might find it easiest to understand this by working mod 3, using the fact that 6 and 15 are both multiples of 3. In fact, if $x \equiv 5\pmod6$ then $x\equiv2\pmod3$. But if $x\equiv7\pmod{15}$ then $x\equiv1\pmod3.$

I feel like such an idiot, but I don't understand why for example if x ≡ 5 (mod 6) then x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
 
  • #4
vincentvance said:
I don't understand why for example if x ≡ 5 (mod 6) then x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
Think of it from the basic definition. If x ≡ 5 (mod 6), it means that $x$ is a multiple of 6, plus 5. Say $x = 6k+5$, for some integer $k$. You can write that as $x = 3(2k+1) + 2$. In other words, $x$ is a multiple of 3, plus 2. That is the same as saying x ≡ 2 (mod 3).
 
  • #5
Opalg said:
Think of it from the basic definition. If x ≡ 5 (mod 6), it means that $x$ is a multiple of 6, plus 5. Say $x = 6k+5$, for some integer $k$. You can write that as $x = 3(2k+1) + 2$. In other words, $x$ is a multiple of 3, plus 2. That is the same as saying x ≡ 2 (mod 3).

Ah. Of course, now it makes sense. Thank you so much!
 

FAQ: System of congruences with no solution

What is a system of congruences with no solution?

A system of congruences with no solution is a set of linear congruences where the equations cannot be satisfied simultaneously. In other words, there is no combination of values that can make all the equations true.

How can you tell if a system of congruences has no solution?

If you can find a common divisor among the coefficients in the equations, then the system has no solution. This is because the modulo operator (typically denoted as %) will always produce a remainder that is a multiple of the common divisor, making it impossible for the equations to have the same remainder.

Why is it important to identify a system of congruences with no solution?

Identifying a system of congruences with no solution can save time and effort in solving the equations. It also helps to avoid errors and incorrect solutions. Additionally, understanding when a system of congruences has no solution is important in more advanced mathematical concepts and applications.

Can a system of congruences with no solution be solved?

No, a system of congruences with no solution cannot be solved. This is because there is no combination of values that can satisfy all the equations at the same time. The system is considered inconsistent, meaning there is no solution that can make it true.

How can you prove that a system of congruences has no solution?

To prove that a system of congruences has no solution, you can use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. This theorem states that a system of congruences has a unique solution if and only if the moduli (numbers being divided by) are pairwise relatively prime. If the moduli are not pairwise relatively prime, then the system has no solution.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top