MHB Tangoforever's question at Yahoo Answers regarding minimizing area of poster

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Poster
AI Thread Summary
To minimize the area of a poster with fixed printed material of 384 cm², the height (h) and width (w) must be calculated considering the margins. The effective height of the printed area is h - 8 cm and the width is w - 4 cm. The area of the poster A is expressed as A = wh, and by substituting the relationship from the printed area, A can be rewritten in terms of h alone. The critical value for h that minimizes the area is found to be 8 + 16√3, leading to a corresponding width of 4(1 + 2√3). This optimization problem illustrates the application of calculus in finding minimum values under constraints.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM HELP! PLEASE?

The top and bottom margins of a poster are 4 cm and the side margins are each 2 cm. If the area of printed material on the poster is fixed at 384 square centimeters, find the dimensions of the poster with the smallest area.

Here is a link to the question:

OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM HELP! PLEASE? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: tangoforever's question at Yahoo! Answers regarding minimzing area of poster

Hello tangoforever,

Let's let $h$ be the height of the poster, and $w$ be the width. All linear measures will be in cm.

We know the height of the printed area is $h-2\cdot4=h-8$ and the width of the printed area is $w-2\cdot2=w-4$. We are given the area of the printed area to be $384\text{ cm}^2$. And since the area of a rectangular region is width times height, we may state:

(1) $$384=(w-4)(h-8)$$

Now, the area of the poster, which we will denote by $A$, is simply width times height, or:

(2) $$A=wh$$

This is the quantity we wish to minimize. Using (1), we may solve for either variable, and then substitute into (2) to get a function in one variable. Let's replace $w$, and so solving (1) for $w$, we find:

(3) $$w=\frac{384}{h-8}+4$$

At this point we may want to recognize that we require $8<h$.

And so we find:

$$A(h)=\left(\frac{384}{h-8}+4 \right)h$$

Next we want to equate the first derivative to zero to find the critical values in the domain of the function. Using the product rule for differentiation, we find:

$$A'(h)=\left(\frac{384}{h-8}+4 \right)(1)+\left(-\frac{384}{(h-8)^2} \right)h=\frac{384(h-8)+4(h-8)^2-384h}{(h-8)^2}=\frac{4\left(h^2-16h-704 \right)}{(h-8)^2}=0$$

Application of the quadratic formula, and discarding the root outside of the domain, yields the critical value:

$$h=8+16\sqrt{3}=8(1+2\sqrt{3})$$

Use of the first derivative test shows that the derivative is negative to the left of this critical value and positive to the right, hence this critical value is at a local minimum, and in fact is the global minimum on the restricted domain.

Here is a plot of the area function for $$8\le h\le64$$:

qx0ytk.jpg


Now, to find the width, we may use (3) which yields:

$$w=\frac{384}{8(1+2\sqrt{3})-8}+4=4(1+2\sqrt{3})=\frac{h}{2}$$

To tangoforever and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization questions in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Congratulations Mark. One of the most elegant posts I've ever seen.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top