Technique in Sequence: How Can I Use Formulas to Find the Next Terms?

  • Thread starter sarah22
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sequence
In summary, the first problem can be solved by taking the differences between terms and noticing the rate of increase, which is 5 times the previous term. The formula is S_n=5^n-3. In the second problem, the formula is (11)(2^n)-3, where n=1. In the third problem, the formula is (-1/3)(-3/2)^n-1, where n=0.
  • #1
sarah22
26
0
Can anyone help me how to get the formula fast?

Example:
1) 2, 4, 8, 16 n=1
Answer: 2^n

Problem:
1) -2, 2, 22, 122... n=0
2) 8, 19, 41, 85, 173, 349... n=1
3) -1/3, 1/2, -3/4... n=1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am really inexperienced at sequences, especially when it comes to finding formulas; so please excuse my help as it could be a very unconventional way to approach the problems.

1) I don't know

2) I noticed that the difference between each term started with 11, and doubled each time so I assumed the formula would be in the form of [tex]y=a.2^{x+b}+c[/tex] and after some guessing, I let a=11 because the first difference was 11... edit: broke a rule.
3) The sequence is being multiplied by [tex]\frac{-3}{2}[/tex] since [tex]\frac{S_2}{S_1}=\frac{S_3}{S_2}=\frac{-3}{2}[/tex] but I'm unsure where to go from there :blushing:
 
Last edited:
  • #3
sarah22 said:
Can anyone help me how to get the formula fast?

Problem:
1) -2, 2, 22, 122...
2) 8, 19, 41, 85, 173, 349...
3) -1/3, 1/2, -3/4...

Hi sarah22! :smile:

In problems like this, the methods that usually work are to write the numbers on one line, and either the differences or the ratios between successive numbers on their next line …

then do it again and again until you get a line that's easy (like 2 2 2 2… or 1 3 5 7 …) …

in at least one of your three problems, you'll have to use both differences and ratios (on different lines, of course) :wink:
 
  • #4
edit: broke a rule.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Mentallic, please do not give complete answers!
 
  • #6
sarah22 said:
Can anyone help me how to get the formula fast?

Problem:
1) -2, 2, 22, 122...
2) 8, 19, 41, 85, 173, 349...
3) -1/3, 1/2, -3/4...

If the formula is a polynomial, try the Lagrange interpolating polynomial.
 
  • #7
Ok I got number 2 and some in 3. I'm sorry I didn't put where the n starts. I'll edit my first post.

2) (11)(2^n) -3
3) (-1/3)(-3/2)^n if n = 0. but it starts with 1 so how can I do it?

I still don't get the other number. OMG. I'm doom.

@Mentallic
Ok I got some in number 3.

@tiny-tim
Yeah I'm doing that but still I don't get number 1 and 3.

@bpet
Can you teach how is it done?

Thanks everyone for helping me. :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Hi sarah22! :wink:

Try 1) … write out the differences and you get … ? :smile:
 
  • #9
Ok here is it. I still don't get it. Oh no! I don't want to fail.

0 -(2) ?(n) n=0
4 -(2) 4(n) n=1
24 -(2) 12(n) n=2
144-(2) 48(n) n=3
 
  • #10
sarah22 said:
0 -(2) ?(n) n=0
4 -(2) 4(n) n=1
24 -(2) 12(n) n=2
144-(2) 48(n) n=3

eugh! you're adding! why are you adding? :cry:

take the differences :smile:
 
  • #11
sarah22 said:
3) (-1/3)(-3/2)^n if n = 0. but it starts with 1 so how can I do it?
You want to make the first term to the power of 0, [tex](-1/3)(-3/2)^0[/tex]

then the next term to the power of 1, [tex](-1/3)(-3/2)^1[/tex]

but for the first term n=1 and for the second, n=2.
Fiddle with the exponent a bit, I'm sure you'll get it :wink:

For #3, when you take the differences between the terms, notice the rate at which the numbers are rising. Is it by a multiple, a ratio, an exponential..?
 
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
eugh! you're adding! why are you adding? :cry:

take the differences :smile:

Ok, I got a technique from my friend. I'll just subtract the first term from the next then see how is it made.

-2, 2, 22, 122... n=0

2-2, 22-2, 122-22
0, 20, 100So on each term it is increase 5 times the previous.

(5^n)
1, 5, 25, 125

so to make the formula correct. You need to minus it by 3. that's it.

My professor didn't teach most of this technique. I really hate her!

Mentallic said:
You want to make the first term to the power of 0, [tex](-1/3)(-3/2)^0[/tex]

then the next term to the power of 1, [tex](-1/3)(-3/2)^1[/tex]

but for the first term n=1 and for the second, n=2.
Fiddle with the exponent a bit, I'm sure you'll get it :wink:

Yeah, I'm a bit crazy the time I posted it. lol. You just need to subtract n in 1.

(-1/3)(-3/2)^n-1

Mentallic said:
For #3, when you take the differences between the terms, notice the rate at which the numbers are rising. Is it by a multiple, a ratio, an exponential..?

I dunno. Is it exponential because I raise it by n?
 
  • #13
sarah22 said:
Ok, I got a technique from my friend. I'll just subtract the first term from the next then see how is it made.

-2, 2, 22, 122... n=0

2-2, 22-2, 122-22
0, 20, 100

did you do this yourself, or just copy it? either way you got it wrong :redface:

it's 2 - (-2) = 4, not 0 …

and how did you get
So on each term it is increase 5 times the previous.
from 0, 20, 100 ?
so to make the formula correct. You need to minus it by 3. that's it.

uhhh? where does the 3 come from? and what do you mean anyway?
My professor didn't teach most of this technique. I really hate her!

tush, sarah22 … that's no way to talk about your nice teacher! :rolleyes:

anyway, show us the formula, just to make sure you've got it now. :smile:
 
  • #14
sarah22 said:
Ok, I got a technique from my friend. I'll just subtract the first term from the next then see how is it made.

-2, 2, 22, 122... n=0

2-2, 22-2, 122-22
0, 20, 100


So on each term it is increase 5 times the previous.
So even though you got the difference between the first and second term wrong, you found the rate of increase correctly. Handy :smile:


sarah22 said:
(5^n)
1, 5, 25, 125

so to make the formula correct. You need to minus it by 3. that's it.
that's it? nearly. Test your formula [tex]S_n=5^n-3[/tex] and you'll see what you're missing.



sarah22 said:
Yeah, I'm a bit crazy the time I posted it. lol. You just need to subtract n in 1.

(-1/3)(-3/2)^n-1



I dunno. Is it exponential because I raise it by n?
Yes :smile:
 

FAQ: Technique in Sequence: How Can I Use Formulas to Find the Next Terms?

What is the purpose of using technique in sequence?

Technique in sequence is a scientific method used to systematically test and analyze the effects of different techniques or actions in a specific order. It allows for a more controlled and precise approach to understanding cause and effect relationships in experiments.

How is technique in sequence different from other experimental methods?

Technique in sequence differs from other experimental methods in that it involves testing a series of techniques or actions in a specific order, rather than just one variable at a time. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of how different techniques or actions may interact and affect the outcome of an experiment.

What are the benefits of using technique in sequence?

There are several benefits to using technique in sequence in scientific experiments. It allows for a more systematic and controlled approach, which can lead to more reliable and accurate results. It also allows for a more comprehensive understanding of cause and effect relationships, and can help identify any potential confounding variables.

What types of experiments are best suited for technique in sequence?

Technique in sequence is best suited for experiments that involve testing the effects of multiple techniques or actions on a specific outcome. This method is particularly useful in experiments where there may be several variables at play, and it is important to understand how they interact and affect the outcome.

Are there any limitations to using technique in sequence?

Like any experimental method, there are limitations to using technique in sequence. One limitation is that it may not be suitable for all types of experiments, particularly those that require a more naturalistic approach. Additionally, it may be more time-consuming and resource-intensive compared to other methods.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top