Tensile and shear capacity of metals

AI Thread Summary
Metals typically exhibit lower shear strength compared to tensile strength due to their crystalline structure and the way they deform under different loads. Theoretical models suggest that the atomic bonds in metals are more effectively aligned to resist tension than shear, leading to a lower shear capacity. However, practical observations often show that the actual shear strength is closer to 70% of the tensile strength, rather than the commonly used rule of thumb of 50%. This discrepancy can be attributed to the energy required for deformation, as shear loading may activate additional slip systems in the crystal structure, enhancing strength. Understanding these differences is crucial for engineering applications involving metal materials.
LT Judd
Messages
25
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
What is the underlying reason for the difference in tensile stress capacity and shear stress capacity in metals?
Steel and other metals data sheets and mill specs most commonly quote some tensile strength metric, like Proof, Yield or Ultimate Tensile Stress. Less common is the value for shear strength. Often as rule of thumb the allowable shear stress is taken as half the allowable tensile stress but, when you do find actual data, its often more like 70%. Example Source: https://www.engineersedge.com/materials/material_tensile_shear_and_yield_strength_15798.htm.
My question is what the underlying theoretical reason is why metals are weaker in shear than in tension, and what is the practical reason why the actual difference is less than the theoretical.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The reason could be the reduced energy or work that is required for the type of deformation that the metal cubic crystal structure suffers under shear load.

Copied from:
https://engineeringlibrary.org/reference/properties-of-metals-doe-handbook

"When metal experiences strain, its volume remains constant. Therefore, if volume remains constant as the dimension changes on one axis, then the dimensions of at least one other axis must change also. If one dimension increases, another must decrease."
 
LT Judd said:
Summary: What is the underlying reason for the difference in tensile stress capacity and shear stress capacity in metals?

and what is the practical reason why the actual difference is less than the theoretical.
I don't see in your post anything that backs up that statement.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top