- #1
mirandab17
- 40
- 0
That's the answer you would get if the current were flowing in the direction opposite what is given in this problem.mirandab17 said:I'm confused as to why I can't simply use the terminal voltage formula here...
Vt = E - Ir = 1.5 - (.5)(.6) = 1.2 V
The actual answer is 1.8 V. Is there a difference because it is "find the terminal voltage of the cell while it is being charged?
mirandab17 said:I'm confused as to why I can't simply use the terminal voltage formula here...
Vt = E - Ir = 1.5 - (.5)(.6) = 1.2 V
The actual answer is 1.8 V. Is there a difference because it is "find the terminal voltage of the cell while it is being charged?
There is the 1.5 Volt cell that's also between the terminals. Right?mirandab17 said:Isn't there only one potential drop? Across the internal resistor?
mirandab17 said:Isn't there only one potential drop? Across the internal resistor?
mirandab17 said:So you have two potential drops within the battery?
The location of the internal resistance doesn't matter. In fact, in a real battery it's distributed in various places in the chemistry of the cell. The simplified model that we work with has an ideal cell in series with a 'lumped' resistance which we call the internal resistance of the battery. Since the cell and resistance are in series, the same current flows through both so the sum of the potential changes is the same regardless of the order in which you add them.mirandab17 said:Hmm... okay... so what would happen if the internal resistor was on the left hand side? Would there still be two potential drops?
It's good to know where a formula comes from and what assumptions it relies on so that you can judge its applicability in different situations. In many cases its easier (and safer!) to apply simple, basic circuit analysis rather than memorize a number of particular-case formulas.I'm just confused because I haven't had to deal with adding up the potential drop across the internal resistor and EMF value itself before in order to find terminal voltage. I thought the terminal voltage equation would just work really simply.
mirandab17 said:Is this an exception though? Because there have been so many other scenarios where I haven't had to do this. Why now did we have to add up the potential drops? As in, why didn't the formula work?
The terminal voltage formula is used to calculate the voltage difference between the positive and negative terminals of a battery or circuit. However, it may not always apply because there are other factors that can affect the voltage, such as internal resistance and external loads.
Internal resistance is the resistance within the battery or circuit itself. It is caused by the materials and design of the battery or circuit and can cause a drop in voltage. This means that the actual terminal voltage may be lower than the calculated value from the formula.
Yes, external loads such as resistors, motors, or other components in the circuit can affect the terminal voltage. These loads can cause a drop in voltage due to the current passing through them, resulting in a lower terminal voltage than the calculated value from the formula.
To account for these factors, we can use a modified version of the terminal voltage formula that takes into consideration the internal resistance and external loads. This modified formula is known as the "internal resistance model" and provides a more accurate calculation of the terminal voltage.
Yes, there are other factors that can affect terminal voltage, such as temperature, age of the battery, and variations in the materials used. These can cause fluctuations in the voltage and may not always align with the calculated value from the formula.