- #1
Kalimaa23
- 279
- 0
Not sure where to put this, so I'll drop it here.
It seems that both NASA and ESA are committed to performing tests that may show deviations from GR.
NASA has LATOR
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/26mar_einstein.htm
And ESA has LISA
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120376_index_0_m.html
and GAIA,
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120377_index_0_m.html
and BepiColombo
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120391_index_0_m.html
The main ESA fundamental physics page explains the relation between the missions:
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=30467
All of these mission should be operational by the end of the decade.
All in all, I think that the 2010's will be an exicting time to do physics, as we may finally get some new experimental results that the theorists (which I will hopefully be joining) can sink their teeth in.
Any thoughts, comments?
It seems that both NASA and ESA are committed to performing tests that may show deviations from GR.
NASA has LATOR
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/26mar_einstein.htm
And ESA has LISA
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120376_index_0_m.html
and GAIA,
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120377_index_0_m.html
and BepiColombo
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/120391_index_0_m.html
The main ESA fundamental physics page explains the relation between the missions:
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=30467
All of these mission should be operational by the end of the decade.
All in all, I think that the 2010's will be an exicting time to do physics, as we may finally get some new experimental results that the theorists (which I will hopefully be joining) can sink their teeth in.
Any thoughts, comments?
Last edited by a moderator: