MHB The area of a triangle and determinants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the area of a triangle can be represented by a determinant formed by its three vertices. The original poster encounters issues with sign discrepancies in their proof, specifically regarding the orientation of the triangle. It is clarified that the determinant yields double the area for a counter-clockwise orientation, while a clockwise orientation results in a negative value. This indicates that the signs in the formulas must be adjusted based on the triangle's orientation. Understanding these orientation effects is crucial for aligning the two area representations.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I was trying to prove that the area of a triangle is equal to the determinant consisting of the three points of the triangle. I got to the end, and something ain't working out. The signs are all wrong.

In the attached pictures I include my proof. Can you please tell me how can the two formulas be identical ? The first is the area coming from trapezoid subtraction , while the second is the determinant.

Thank you !

Clarification: when I say signs are opposite, I mean (y2-y3) vs. (y3-y2) , etc...

View attachment 7656

View attachment 7657

View attachment 7658

View attachment 7659
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    28.4 KB · Views: 111
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    17.7 KB · Views: 121
  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    4.9 KB · Views: 107
  • 4.PNG
    4.PNG
    7.1 KB · Views: 119
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel,

The determinant gives double the area of a triangle that is oriented counter-clockwise.
In your case the triangle is oriented clockwise, meaning that we'll find the opposite.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top