The Cooper Problem in tight binding

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the Cooper problem in a one-dimensional lattice with a specified lattice constant. The reciprocal lattice vector is defined, and the nearest neighbor approximation involves summing over specific k values. The equation to solve for energy E is presented, involving a sum of terms related to the weights and energies at those k values. It is confirmed that the values of |w_{i}| should equal 1, and the values of ξ_{i} can either be provided or calculated from the energies. This approach is deemed correct for analyzing the system.
mcas
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Find the coupling energy of a Cooper pair in a 1D lattice in tight binding (nearest neighbors), i.e. solve the Cooper Problem.
Relevant Equations
An equation to solve:
[itex]1=\lambda \sum_{\vec{k}} |w_{\vec{k}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{\vec{k}}}[/itex] for [itex]{\xi_\vec{k} \geq 0}[/itex]
where:
[itex]\lambda = const[/itex] is a part of a seperable potential [itex]V_{\vec{k}\vec{k'}}[/itex]
[itex]\xi_{\vec{k}} = \varepsilon_{\vec{k}}-\mu[/itex]
[itex]w_{\vec{k}}[/itex] is [itex]1[/itex] for [itex]\hbar w_D \geq \xi_{\vec{k}} \geq 0[/itex] and [itex]0[/itex] in any other case
We have a one dimensional lattice with a lattice constant equal to a (I'm omitting vector notation because we are in 1D). The reciprocal lattice vector is k_n=n\frac{2 \pi}{a}.
So to get the nearest neighbour approximation I need to sum over k = -\frac{2 \pi}{a}, 0, \frac{2 \pi}{a}.
If I understand everything correctly this would be the equation I need to solve for E:
1=\lambda ( |w_{\frac{2 \pi}{a}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{\frac{2 \pi}{a}}} + |w_{0}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{0}} + |w_{-\frac{2 \pi}{a}}|^2 \frac{1}{E-2\xi_{-\frac{2 \pi}{a}}})

I'm not sure if this is the right approach. If so, would the values of |w_{i}| equal 1 in this equation? Do we know the values of \xi_{i}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is the correct approach. The values of |w_{i}| should equal 1, and the values of \xi_{i} should be given in the problem statement or can be calculated from the corresponding energies.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top