- #36
vorcil
- 398
- 0
It dosen't rot the ground,
Cyrus said:Not really. Let's say you're dead and a skeleton. That in and of itself isn't going to bring you back to life and keep all your past memories in tact. That information would be in your brain. So really, all you need is a jar with your brain in it. It has the DNA to reconstruct the rest of your body, which is all you really need.
BobG said:It's also hard to achieve emotional closure if you see your dead loved one lying on your front lawn every morning. Personally, I'd have to at least drag my loved one's dead body into a neighbor's yard.
Cyrus said:Not really. Let's say you're dead and a skeleton. That in and of itself isn't going to bring you back to life and keep all your past memories in tact. That information would be in your brain. So really, all you need is a jar with your brain in it. It has the DNA to reconstruct the rest of your body, which is all you really need.
fufalian said:If I'll be buried after death,I believe in the future nature may produce a new life which have connections with my present life and which is worth to live as my life.Since nature had created humans from lifeless chaos,no one can exclude this possibility.
Moonbear said:I would argue that the bacteria that feast on dead bodies are a good reason to go with cremation. Particularly when people live in high density populations and lack a lot of places to let bodies rot that won't contaminate your water supplies or expose the general population to pathogens that infect human bodies.
.
GeorginaS said:Okay, brutal but awfully funny.
And yes, to be constructive, in high-density population areas, burial takes up too much real estate. Plus, people who get buried tend to go with the whole coffin routine, so the bio degrading process would take far too long to be sustainable with so many people dying all the time.
You could go with the Towers of Silence route, but according to one account I read, the vultures had a habit of dropping bits of people parts in the city-proper. I don't know that I'd want to live with hunks of dead people falling on me.
Cremation is, to me, a sensible option, after donating any usable parts. And while I realize it's entirely irrational, because I'll be dead, I don't like the idea of being in the ground. It's cold in there. I'd prefer to be warm, thanks.
fufalian said:The one chooses natural burial believes that death is not the final end of life,his life is with nature,the natural process that created human life is a creative and living force.
The one chooses cremation believes that death is the final end of life,it is not necessary to return the body to earth,so destroy it by burn it to gases and ashes.By thus doing the dead was really destroyed and is really the final end of life once for all.
Up right burial won't take much space and the 'coffin' used is biodegradable
fufalian said:I'd rather be a tree than a diamond.There are huge amount of diamonds in the univers,but no life has been found outside of earth,so a tree or even a bacterium is much more precious than diamonds.
One chooses to be burried in ground and a tree be plant on the above will be the food of the tree and eventually he become that tree.
phyzmatix said:It's commonly accepted that ash is a great fertilizer so you could just spread that around the base of a tree...or even mix it with some potting soil and sort out whichever plant you want right in your kitchen. No need to plant all of grandpa in the backyard to get some apricots out of him
EDIT: Actually, burying isn't "au naturale" at all once you think about it. Which other species of animal buries their dead? I would think that, naturally, your body would've been devoured by wild animals so perhaps the MOST natural way to go is to turn yourself into some form of dog food (since we no longer have easy access to packs of carnivorous wild animals to do the deed for us). Just a thought.
SticksandStones said:Elephants.
undidly said:Give away as many organs as you can.
In the future when cloning is legal you can be reborn from the DNA in the donated organs.
No memories of course but the same physical type and personality.
New you would also inherit all your wealth,leave it all to yourself.
Invested money would earn interest on which TAX would be payable.
Are you listening government,tax the dead.Get onto it.Cloning now.
I want the remaining bits to be partially cremated to kill any microbes that are dangerous
but not to burn the carbon.
The carbon would be in the form of charcoal which is a good soil conditioner and lasts
for 100,000 years or until burned.
New me could visit the charcoal and the plants that benefit from it.
phyzmatix said:It's commonly accepted that ash is a great fertilizer so you could just spread that around the base of a tree...or even mix it with some potting soil and sort out whichever plant you want right in your kitchen. No need to plant all of grandpa in the backyard to get some apricots out of him
EDIT: Actually, burying isn't "au naturale" at all once you think about it. Which other species of animal buries their dead? I would think that, naturally, your body would've been devoured by wild animals so perhaps the MOST natural way to go is to turn yourself into some form of dog food (since we no longer have easy access to packs of carnivorous wild animals to do the deed for us). Just a thought.
phyzmatix said:*sigh*
A thin layer of dust, twigs and leaves and 6 feet of soil is not the same thing now is it?
lisab said:Neanderthals.
SticksandStones said:Burying is burying.
That's like saying a bicycle isn't a transportation device because it isn't the same thing as a car.