The Falsity of Religion: Twelve Indisputable Arguments

  • Thread starter Niels Bohr
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Religion
In summary, the conversation discusses the falsity of religion and the dilemma it presents. The author argues that while religion may have been useful in the past, it is ultimately false and must be recognized as such in order to move forward and understand its true purpose. The article also presents twelve reasons why religion should be viewed as false by rational individuals.
  • #1
Niels Bohr
14
0
The following is from http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Relig/Relig-Atheist.html

The Falsity of Religion: Twelve Indisputable Arguments

By John "Birdman" Bryant

Religion today hangs on the horns of a dilemma: On the one hand, it is false in the scientific sense, as we shall demonstrate below; but on the other hand, because religion in one form or another has been around as long as recorded history -- and in fact has played a central role in man's social and personal life -- it is almost certain that religion is useful in the sense that it has helped men to survive. The real dilemma of religion, however, is that it must be believed in order to be useful, yet this is impossible when people know that it is false.

The obvious solution to this dilemma -- if indeed there is a solution -- is to discover what is useful about religion, and to try to make use of this knowledge. This I have attempted to do in my book The Most Powerful Idea Ever Discovered. But we will be stymied in our attempt to accomplish this task -- or at least to bring it to fruition in the sense of teaching others -- if we do not first and finally sweep away the foolishness of religious belief by making a plain and clear statement as to religion's literal falsity. Accordingly, we cite below what we view as twelve compelling reasons why a rational person must regard religion as false.

Complete article is at http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Relig/Relig-Atheist.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
we no longer have new discussions of religion in PF...we have an archive forum if you would like to continue discussions there...
 
  • #3


While the author presents a well-reasoned argument for the falsity of religion, it is important to note that this is just one perspective. Religion and belief in a higher power is a deeply personal and subjective experience for many people, and cannot be reduced to a simple set of arguments. Additionally, the author's assertion that religion is only useful because it has helped people to survive is a narrow and reductionist view. Religion serves many purposes in people's lives, including providing a sense of community, comfort, and guidance. It is not solely about survival. Furthermore, the idea that religion must be believed in order to be useful is also flawed. Many people find value in the moral teachings and principles of religion, even if they do not believe in a literal interpretation of religious texts. In the end, it is up to each individual to determine the role and importance of religion in their own life, and it is not for others to invalidate their beliefs.
 

FAQ: The Falsity of Religion: Twelve Indisputable Arguments

1. What are the twelve arguments presented in "The Falsity of Religion"?

The twelve arguments in "The Falsity of Religion" are: the lack of evidence for a deity, the existence of suffering and evil in the world, the incompatibility of science and religion, the problem of religious diversity, the role of religion in fueling violence and conflict, the existence of contradictions and inconsistencies within religious texts, the reliance on faith rather than reason, the historical and cultural context of religious beliefs, the absence of a moral code unique to religion, the concept of an all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving deity, the use of religion as a tool for control and manipulation, and the lack of a rational basis for religious beliefs.

2. How does the lack of evidence for a deity disprove religion?

The lack of evidence for a deity is one of the most fundamental arguments against religion. Religion claims the existence of a supernatural being or beings who created and control the universe. However, there is no empirical evidence or scientific proof to support this claim. In the absence of evidence, it is irrational to believe in the existence of a deity, and therefore, religion is based on a false premise.

3. Can religion and science coexist?

The compatibility of religion and science is a highly debated topic. While some argue that science and religion can coexist and complement each other, the two are fundamentally different ways of understanding the world. Science relies on empirical evidence and experimentation, while religion relies on faith and belief in the supernatural. Therefore, it is difficult to reconcile the two, and many scientific discoveries have challenged religious beliefs, making it challenging for them to coexist harmoniously.

4. What is the role of religion in promoting violence and conflict?

Religion is often used as a justification for violence and conflict. Throughout history, wars have been fought in the name of religion, and many atrocities have been committed in the name of a deity. This is due to the belief in absolute truths and the idea that one's religion is the only true religion, leading to intolerance and a lack of respect for other beliefs. Additionally, religious texts and teachings can be interpreted in different ways, leading to conflicts between different sects or denominations within a religion.

5. Is it possible to have morals without religion?

Many argue that religion is necessary for morality, but this is not the case. Morality is a set of principles that dictate what is right and wrong, and it can exist independent of religion. In fact, many secular societies have strong moral codes that are not based on religious beliefs. Morality is a product of human empathy, reason, and social norms, not religion. Therefore, it is possible to have morals without religion.

Similar threads

Back
Top