A The force from the energy gradient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of gradient energy in classical field theory, specifically identifying the term E as elastic potential energy. It questions whether the associated force F can be expressed as -∂xφ, derived from the energy term. The conversation clarifies that changing the coefficient from 1/2 to 2 affects the force calculation, as the force is not scale invariant. It emphasizes that the factor in the energy term cannot be ignored, as it directly impacts the force's definition. Understanding the relationship between energy and force is crucial for accurate physical interpretations.
user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
Please see below
From this post-gradient energy in classical field theory, one identifies the term ##E\equiv\frac{1}{2}\left(\partial_x\phi\right)^2## as the gradient energy which can be interpreted as elastic potential energy.

Can one then say that $$F\equiv -\frac{\partial E}{\partial\left(\partial_x\phi\right)}=-\partial_x\phi$$
is the associated force?

In addition, if one has the factor as ##2## instead of ##\frac{1}{2}##, can one just ignore the factor of ##4## and claim that the associated force is ##-\partial_x\phi## since the factor is just a scaling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No and no. The second no is obvious; the force is not scale invariant, so the scale matters. To understand the first no, ask yourself: the force on what?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
915
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top