The general equation of the superposition of orthogonal waves?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for the superposition of two orthogonal waves represented by x and y, specifically the equation x² - 2xycos(δ) + y² = A²sin(δ)². Participants explore the algebraic manipulation of the wave equations, x = Acos(ωt) and y = Acos(ωt + δ), to reach the desired result. The concept of orthogonality is examined, noting that it pertains to the waves' representation in the x-y plane rather than a more complex interpretation. Additionally, real-life applications, such as the behavior of electromagnetic waves in birefringent materials, are mentioned to illustrate the relevance of the topic. The conversation emphasizes the importance of visualizing the resulting waveforms and their interactions.
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
derive the general formula of the superposition of two waves which are orthogonal ?
Relevant Equations
x^2-2xy*cos(δ)+y^2 = A^2 sin(δ)^2
hi guys
i was trying to derive the general formula of two orthogonal waves
$$x^{2}-2xycos(δ)+y^{2} = A^{2} sin(δ)^{2}$$
where the two waves are given by :
$$x = Acos(ωt)$$
$$y = Acos(ωt+δ)$$
where ##δ## is the different in phase , i know it seems trivial but i am stuck on where should i begin ?
my trial :
$$x^2 = A^2 cos(ωt)^2$$
$$y = A[cos(ωt)cos(δ)-sin(ωt)sin(δ)]$$
squaring ##y## :
$$y^2 = A^2[cos(ωt)cos(δ)-sin(ωt)sin(δ)]^2⇒ y^2 = A^2 [cos(ωt)^2cos(δ)^2+sin(ωt)^2sin(δ)^2-2cos(ωt)cos(δ)sin(ωt)sin(δ)] $$
it seems that it got more complicated 🤔 where to continue from here , or is there another method to get :
$$x^{2}-2xycos(δ)+y^{2} = A^{2} sin(δ)^{2}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't stop now, you're basically there! You have$$\begin{align*}x^2 + y^2 &= A^2[\cos^2{\omega t} + \cos^2{\omega t}\cos^2{\delta} + \sin^2{\omega t} \sin^2{\delta}] - 2A^2 \sin{\omega t}\cos{\omega t}\sin{\delta}\cos{\delta} \\ \\ -2xy\cos{\delta} &= -2A^2 \cos^2{\omega t}\cos^2{\delta} + 2A^2 \sin{\omega t}\cos{\omega t}\sin{\delta} \cos{\delta}\end{align*}$$What do you get if you add them together? Now it's just a case of applying ##\sin^2{\theta} + \cos^2{\theta} = 1## a couple of times 😄
 
  • Informative
Likes patric44
Umm.. what has this to do with orthogonality?
 
haruspex said:
Umm.. what has this to do with orthogonality?
this is the true statement of the problem , i guess because one wave is on the x and other on the y and has nothing to do with the more sophisticated meaning of the "orthogonality" :smile:
 
haruspex said:
Umm.. what has this to do with orthogonality?

I think we have two orthogonal waves, one defined by ##x = A\cos{(\omega t - kz)}## and another defined by ##y=A\cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}##, both propagating along the ##z## axis. Then we consider the wave formed by superposing those two. For the purposes of this problem, it would suffice to just consider the interference ##z=0##.

[I think a real life application of this type of thing is resolving the electric field of an EM wave passing through a birefringent material w.r.t. the fast and slow axes, for instance!]
 
  • Like
Likes patric44 and Delta2
etotheipi said:
I think we have two orthogonal waves, one defined by ##x = A\cos{(\omega t - kz)}## and another defined by ##y=A\cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}##, both propagating along the ##z## axis. Then we consider the wave formed by superposing those two. For the purposes of this problem, it would suffice to just consider the interference ##z=0##.

[I think a real life application of this type of thing is resolving the electric field of an EM wave passing through a birefringent material w.r.t. the fast and slow axes, for instance!]
In that model, wouldn't the superposition be ##A\cos{(\omega t - kz)}\hat x+A\cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}\hat y##?
The algebra in your solution does not seem to have used any property of the wave pair other than having the same amplitude and frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
haruspex said:
In that model, wouldn't the superposition be ##A\cos{(\omega t - kz)}\hat x+A\cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}\hat y##?
The algebra in your solution does not seem to have used any property of the wave pair other than having the same amplitude and frequency.

That's indeed the superposition we're after! But we're just interested in deriving that identity ##x^{2}-2xy\cos(\delta)+y^{2} = A^{2} \sin(\delta)^{2}## for the ##x## and ##y## values on the resultant wave corresponding to any chosen ##z##, so I don't think it's more complicated than that.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
It took me a while to realize what the equation ##x^{2}-2xy\cos(\delta)+y^{2} = A^{2} \sin(\delta)^{2}## represents. I'll make a comment in case anyone else was having the same problem.

If you define a vector ##\vec V = A\cos{(\omega t )}\hat x+A\cos{(\omega t + \delta)}\hat y## and draw the vector from the origin of the x-y system, then the tip of ##\vec V## traces out a curve as a function of time.

The parametric represent of the curve is ##x(t) = A\cos{(\omega t )}##, ##\,\,\,y(t) = A\cos{(\omega t + \delta)}##.

Eliminating the parameter ##t## yields the direct relation between ##x## and ##y##. The result is the equation of the ellipse ##x^{2}-2xy\cos(\delta)+y^{2} = A^{2} \sin(\delta)^{2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes patric44, Delta2 and haruspex
If you plot the parametric curve ##(x,y,z) = (\cos{(\omega t - kz)}, \cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}, z)##, representing the superposition of two orthogonal waves of equations ##x = \cos{(\omega t - kz)}## and ##y=\cos{(\omega t - kz + \delta)}##, you end up with something like

1603785024541.png


If you vary ##t##, the wave translates in the ##z## direction. If you vary ##\delta##, you change the eccentricity of the projection of the wave onto the ##x-y## plane.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
  • #10
  • Love
Likes patric44 and etotheipi
  • #11
TSny said:
You can play with this visualization

That's awesome! I found a nice summary of the relevant Physics here: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/schwartz/files/lecture14-polarization.pdf

There's also the interesting case where you have birefringence, ##\Delta n \neq 0##, which results in the two 'component waves' having different wavenumbers, and if we add the components in the normal way we can work how the plane of polarisation has changed after exiting the crystal!

I think I need to read it again to fully understand it, but I hope @patric44, you also find it useful!
 
  • Like
Likes patric44

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K