- #1
natural
- 26
- 0
Aim: to test the Faraday relationship: induced e.m.f. equals the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage
flux linkage = NBA
N=number of turns in coil
B=magnetic flux density
A=area of the coil
To investigate the relationship above first i must have two quantities constant while the thired is varied.
from what i understand i should keep t constant and vary the rest and plot e.m.f vs N
then keep N constant and vary the rest and plot e.m.f vs I both of these graphs i think should give a staight line.
apparatus used would be: pair of solenoids of square cross-section; one has twice the area of the other
signal generator: use the low impedance output and set the frequency on the 100 Hz to 1000Hz range.
Cathode ray oscilloscope for measuring the peak induced voltage.
magnetic flux linkage = NBA
e.m.f= NA dB/dt
but dB/dt is porportinal to I and I is proportional to f
therefore e.m.f = NAf
i'm lost up to this point if i do all of this, what can i conclude anout the Faraday relationship.what other readings must i take etc.. please help
flux linkage = NBA
N=number of turns in coil
B=magnetic flux density
A=area of the coil
To investigate the relationship above first i must have two quantities constant while the thired is varied.
from what i understand i should keep t constant and vary the rest and plot e.m.f vs N
then keep N constant and vary the rest and plot e.m.f vs I both of these graphs i think should give a staight line.
apparatus used would be: pair of solenoids of square cross-section; one has twice the area of the other
signal generator: use the low impedance output and set the frequency on the 100 Hz to 1000Hz range.
Cathode ray oscilloscope for measuring the peak induced voltage.
magnetic flux linkage = NBA
e.m.f= NA dB/dt
but dB/dt is porportinal to I and I is proportional to f
therefore e.m.f = NAf
i'm lost up to this point if i do all of this, what can i conclude anout the Faraday relationship.what other readings must i take etc.. please help