The Many Worlds Theory and Immortality

In summary, the Many Worlds theory states that every time a sentient being observes a particle in superposition, the universe splits into multiple universes, with each outcome having its own universe. This results in the duplication and distribution of consciousness throughout these universes. It is believed that when a person dies, their consciousness will only end up in a universe where they are able to observe it. This leads to the implication that from each person's point of view, they are immortal and invincible, as they will only observe universes in which they survive. However, this theory is not supported by quantum mechanics and is not appropriate for discussion on PF due to its speculative nature.
  • #1
JDude13
95
0
Forgive me if I have not grasped the ideas and intricacies of the Many Worlds theory. If I don't quite understand it all it's probably because I'm 16. :bugeye:
My theory goes like this:

According to the many worlds theory, every time a sentient being observes the outcome of the a particle in superposition the superposition breaks down and the universe splits into as many universes as there are outcomes in the probability of each result of the superposition.

Every being's conciousness is duplicated and distributed throughout the resulting universes (naturally).

When a person dies, I believe that, from the perspective of the victim, their conciousness will only end up in a universe where they can observe that universe. Therefore, when there is an outcome where someone has a chance of dieing, they will only observe a universe in which their particle configuration enables them to survive.

The implication: From every person's point of view, they are immortal and invincible. You may observe other's deaths but not your own.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is not quantum mechanics, this is not correct, and this is not appropriate for PF. Please reread the PF Rules, particularly those on overly speculative posts.
 

FAQ: The Many Worlds Theory and Immortality

What is the Many Worlds Theory?

The Many Worlds Theory, also known as the Parallel Universes or Multiverse Theory, is a hypothesis in physics that suggests that there exist multiple parallel universes that are similar to our own but have slightly different properties or outcomes. This theory proposes that every possible outcome of a quantum event actually occurs in a separate universe.

How does the Many Worlds Theory relate to immortality?

The Many Worlds Theory suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum event occurs in a separate universe. Therefore, according to this theory, there exists a universe where a person does not die and continues to live on, effectively achieving immortality. However, this does not mean that a person can physically travel to this other universe and continue living; it is merely a hypothesis based on the laws of quantum mechanics.

Is the Many Worlds Theory scientifically proven?

No, the Many Worlds Theory is still a hypothesis and has not been proven. It is a popular and widely debated theory in the field of physics, but there is currently no concrete evidence to support it. However, there are experiments being conducted to try and test this theory, and the results may provide more insight into its validity.

What are some criticisms of the Many Worlds Theory?

One of the main criticisms of the Many Worlds Theory is that it is untestable and therefore cannot be considered a scientific theory. Another criticism is that it is a complex and convoluted explanation for quantum events, and there may be simpler and more elegant solutions. Additionally, some scientists argue that the existence of multiple parallel universes is a philosophical or metaphysical concept rather than a scientific one.

Can the Many Worlds Theory be applied to other areas besides immortality?

Yes, the Many Worlds Theory has been explored in various fields, including cosmology, philosophy, and science fiction. It has been used to explain other concepts such as the origin of the universe, the existence of alternate timelines, and the concept of free will. However, as it is still a hypothesis, its applicability to these areas is still a topic of debate among scientists and philosophers.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
247
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
117
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top