MHB The Minimum Value of a Quadratic Function: A Question of Symmetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The quadratic function f(x) = x^2 + 2px + p has a minimum value of -p, with the axis of symmetry at x = a. The calculation shows that a - f(a) equals zero, confirming that the minimum value occurs at the axis of symmetry. There is a suggestion to recheck the original problem statement, as confusion arises regarding whether the question intended to ask for a + f(a) instead of a - f(a). Ultimately, the discussion concludes that the original problem correctly states a - f(a) = 0, but the alternative interpretation could lead to a different answer from the provided choices.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A quadratic function $$f(x)=x^2+2px+p$$ has the minimum value of –p with $$p\neq0$$. If the curve's symmetrical axis is x = a, then a – f(a) = ...
A. –6
B. –4
C. 4
D. 6
E. 8

Because the curve's symmetrical axis is x = a, then:
$$-\frac{2p}{2(1)}=a$$
–p = a

a – f(a) = –p + (–p) = 0

I got zero. Is there anything I did wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
$a – f(a) = –p + (–p) = 0

$a - f(a) = {\color{red}-p - (-p)} = -p + p = 0$

agree with zero ... maybe recheck the original problem statement?
 
If the problem is indeed asking for $a - f(a)$ then the answer is zero. However ...

The minimum value occurs on the axis of symmetry. Therefore the minimum value is $f(a) = f(-p) = (-p)^2 + 2p(-p) + p = p-p^2$. But you are told that the minimum value is $-p$. Therefore $p-p^2 = -p$, and since $p\ne0$ it follows that $p=2$. Hence $a = -2$, and $f(a)$ is also $-2$. Therefore $a-f(a) = 0$, as we already knew. BUT, if the quetion was actually asking for $a\;{\color{red}+}\,f(a)$ then that would be $-2-2 = -4$, which has the advantage of being one of the multiple choices.

So I agree with skeeter that you should recheck the original problem statement, and in particular look again at whether it is actually asking for $a+f(a)$.
 
I checked the problem and it said a – f(a), so probably the writer didn't press the Shift button correctly when he/she intended to type "+".
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top