The Missing Intercept: -1,0 in Parametric Equations

  • MHB
  • Thread starter soroban
  • Start date
In summary, the parametric equations given describe a unit circle centered at the origin. The y-intercepts are (0,1) and (0,-1) and the x-intercept is (-1,0). The other possible x-intercept, t=0, is undefined as it results in a division by 0. This can also be seen analytically by setting y=0 and solving for x, resulting in a quadratic equation with no real solutions.
  • #1
soroban
194
0

Consider the parametric equations: [tex]\:\begin{Bmatrix}x &=& \dfrac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \\ y &=& \dfrac{2t}{t^2+1} \end{Bmatrix}[/tex]

Then: [tex]\;x^2 + y^2 \:=\:\left(\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\right)^2 \;=\;\frac{(t^2-1)^2 + (2t)^2}{(t^2+1)^2}[/tex]

. . . . [tex]=\;\frac{t^4-2t^2+1 +4t^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{t^4+2t^2+1}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;\frac{(t^2+1)^2}{(t^2+1)^2} \;=\;1 [/tex]

We have: [tex]\;x^2+y^2\,=\,1[/tex], a unit circle centered at the origin.Find the [tex]y[/tex]-intercepts.
Set [tex]x=0\!:\;\frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} \,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t\,=\,\pm1[/tex]
. . Hence: [tex]\;y \:=\:\frac{2(\pm1)}{(\pm1)^2+1} \:=\:\pm1[/tex]

The [tex]y[/tex]-intercepts are: [tex]\;(0,1),\;(0,-1)[/tex]Find the [tex]x[/tex]-intercepts.
Set [tex]y = 0\!:\;\frac{2t}{t^2+1}\,=\,0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad t \,=\,0[/tex]
. . Hence: [tex]\;x \:=\:\frac{0^2-1}{0^2+1} \:=\:-1[/tex]

The [tex]x[/tex]-intercept is: [tex]\;(-1,0)[/tex]What happened to the other [tex]x[/tex]-intercept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A way of thinking on it.

You are giving to any point of the unit circle the parametrization given by the equation of a line whose gradient is rational and passes through $(1,0)$, and the parameter is when that line intersect the circle at a point diferent from $(1,0)$, then the point $(1,0)$ is going to infinity since it's line is tangent to the circle through $(1,0)$.
 
  • #3
Another, purely analytic, way of looking at it:
The second "solution" for $y=0$ is $t= \infty$ because
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{2t}{t^2+1} = 0.$$
So taking the limit as $t \to \infty$ of $x$ gives
$$\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{t^2-1}{t^2+1} = 1,$$
and $(x,y) = (1,0).$
 

FAQ: The Missing Intercept: -1,0 in Parametric Equations

1. What is the significance of the missing intercept (-1,0) in parametric equations?

The missing intercept (-1,0) in parametric equations indicates that the graph of the equation does not intersect with the y-axis at that point. This could mean that the graph is either parallel to the y-axis or does not intersect the y-axis at all.

2. How do you find the missing intercept in parametric equations?

To find the missing intercept in parametric equations, you can set the parameter equal to the missing value and solve for the corresponding variable. For example, if the missing intercept is (-1,0), you can set the parameter t equal to -1 and solve for x.

3. Can a parametric equation have more than one missing intercept?

Yes, a parametric equation can have more than one missing intercept. This can occur when the equation has multiple parameters or when the graph is complex and intersects multiple axes.

4. What does the missing intercept represent in parametric equations?

The missing intercept in parametric equations represents a point where the graph of the equation does not intersect with the corresponding axis. This can provide valuable information about the behavior of the graph and its relationship to the axes.

5. How does the missing intercept affect the overall shape of the graph in parametric equations?

The missing intercept can greatly impact the shape of the graph in parametric equations. Depending on the value and location of the missing intercept, the graph can be shifted, rotated, or stretched. It is important to consider the missing intercept when analyzing and graphing parametric equations.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
897
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Back
Top