The Power of 0: Is It Just An Agreement?

  • Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Power
In summary, the concept of a number to the power of 0 being equal to 1 is not "just" an agreement, but rather a definition that is consistent with other mathematical properties. This definition is necessary to maintain the property that xn times xm equals xn+m, even when one of the exponents is 0. It can also be thought of as a notation, where each time the exponent decreases, one factor of the base is factored out until it reaches 1. This helps to better understand the concept of "raised to a zero power" and negative exponents.
  • #1
TSN79
424
0
We all know that a number to the power of 0 equals 1. Bit I heard this is only a definition, iow something that has just been agreed on. But how can such a thing be done? If one had agreed that it would equal 0 instead, I suppose many mathematical proofs and stuff would be different, things that can't be done suddenly would be possible. Is it really the case that this is just an agreement?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TSN79 said:
We all know that a number to the power of 0 equals 1. Bit I heard this is only a definition, iow something that has just been agreed on. But how can such a thing be done? If one had agreed that it would equal 0 instead, I suppose many mathematical proofs and stuff would be different, things that can't be done suddenly would be possible. Is it really the case that this is just an agreement?
It is according to the definition of raising a number to a power that a nonzero number to the zero power is equal to one, just like it is according to this definition that a x to the second power is x times x. It is really not an unnatural definition. We know that [itex]x^n\times x^m=x^{m+n}[/itex]. If we want this to be true then [itex]x^n\times x^0=x^n \rightarrow x^0=1[/itex]. Alternitively, powers can be defined by series. In this case [itex]b^x=e^{x\ln{b}}[/itex] and
[tex]e^x=1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!}[/tex]
So
[tex]b^x=e^{0\ln{b}}=1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{0^n}{n!}=1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
TSN79 said:
We all know that a number to the power of 0 equals 1. Bit I heard this is only a definition, iow something that has just been agreed on. But how can such a thing be done? If one had agreed that it would equal 0 instead, I suppose many mathematical proofs and stuff would be different, things that can't be done suddenly would be possible. Is it really the case that this is just an agreement?

Drop the word "just" and I will agree with you. In mathematics, everything in mathematics is a definition but not "just" a definition! As Leonhard Euler said, it is not "an unnatural definition".

From the simplest case, xn with n a positive integer, where we can think of xn as meaning "x multiplied by itself n times" (which is, after all, "just" a definition), we find that xnxm= xn+m because "n times" followed by "m times" is the same as "n+ m times".

If we want that very nice property to continue to be true even if m is 0, we must have xnx0= xn+ 0. But n+0= 0 so we have xnx0= xn. As long as x is not 0, we can divide both sides by xn and get x0= 1.

That is why we define x0 to be 1 (and only define it for x not equal to 0).
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
Drop the word "just" and I will agree with you. In mathematics, everything in mathematics is a definition but not "just" a definition! As Leonhard Euler said, it is not "an unnatural definition".
From the simplest case, xn with n a positive integer, where we can think of xn as meaning "x multiplied by itself n times" (which is, after all, "just" a definition), we find that xnxm= xn+m because "n times" followed by "m times" is the same as "n+ m times".
If we want that very nice property to continue to be true even if m is 0, we must have xnx0= xn+ 0. But n+0= 0 so we have xnx0= xn. As long as x is not 0, we can divide both sides by xn and get x0= 1.
That is why we define x0 to be 1 (and only define it for x not equal to 0).
Excellent explanation thank you. However N+0=N not N+0=0.
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy said:
Drop the word "just" and I will agree with you. In mathematics, everything in mathematics is a definition but not "just" a definition! As Leonhard Euler said, it is not "an unnatural definition".
From the simplest case, xn with n a positive integer, where we can think of xn as meaning "x multiplied by itself n times" (which is, after all, "just" a definition), we find that xnxm= xn+m because "n times" followed by "m times" is the same as "n+ m times".
If we want that very nice property to continue to be true even if m is 0, we must have xnx0= xn+ 0. But n+0= 0 so we have xnx0= xn. As long as x is not 0, we can divide both sides by xn and get x0= 1.
That is why we define x0 to be 1 (and only define it for x not equal to 0).

i was confused if 1^0 = 1 and 1^n = 1 (n= 1,2,3...)
then o = 1,2,3...
 
  • #6
debeng said:
i was confused if 1^0 = 1 and 1^n = 1 (n= 1,2,3...)
then o = 1,2,3...
That's like saying 0*0 = 0 and 0*n = 0 (n= 1,2,3...) then 0 = 1,2,3...

Think about why that isn't true for a moment.
 
  • #7
This is the example I usually think of when this comes up: 1=xn/xn=xn-n=x0.
 
  • #8
StatusX said:
This is the example I usually think of when this comes up: 1=xn/xn=xn-n=x0.
That works also.
 
  • #9
Another way I like to think of it as a notation with xn, where you factor out an x each time n decreases. If x = 3,

x3 = 27

if you factor out three 27/3

x2 = 9

factor out three again 9/3

x1 = 3

and factoring three again 3/3

x0 = 1

I really had trouble visualing "raised to a zero power" and "negative exponents" until I "just" thought of it as a notation.
 

FAQ: The Power of 0: Is It Just An Agreement?

What is the concept behind "The Power of 0"?

The concept behind "The Power of 0" is that zero, or nothing, has the potential to be powerful when it is acknowledged and agreed upon by a group of individuals. It is not just a number, but an agreement among people that gives it power.

How does this concept apply to real life situations?

This concept can be applied to various real life situations, such as in relationships, organizations, or even society as a whole. It suggests that when people come together and agree upon something, even if it seems insignificant or empty, it can have a significant impact and create a powerful force for change.

Is there any scientific evidence to support this idea?

While there may not be direct scientific evidence for the concept of "The Power of 0," there are studies and theories that suggest the power of group dynamics and the impact of social agreements. For example, the bystander effect and herd mentality are both phenomena that demonstrate the power of group influence on individual behavior.

Can "The Power of 0" be used for both positive and negative outcomes?

Yes, the power of zero can be harnessed for both positive and negative outcomes. It ultimately depends on the intentions and actions of the individuals who are in agreement. For example, a group of people can use their collective power to make positive changes in the world, but they can also use it to cause harm and chaos.

How can individuals make use of "The Power of 0" in their daily lives?

Individuals can make use of "The Power of 0" by being more aware of the agreements they make with others, whether it be in personal relationships or in larger societal structures. By recognizing and consciously participating in these agreements, individuals can have a greater understanding and influence on the power dynamics at play in their daily lives.

Similar threads

2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
884
Replies
55
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top